Legal Age at Which People can Marry Should be at Least 21 - IELTS Essay Task 2 Band 9 Sample

Write about the following topic:

Some people feel that the legal age at which people can marry should be at least 21.

To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge and experiences.

You should write at least 250 words.

Get your personalised IELTS Essay Feedback from a former examiner

Download IELTS eBooks, get everything you need to achieve a high band score

Sample Essay 1

The question of raising the legal marriage age to 21 stirs considerable debate. I firmly believe this adjustment is beneficial, focusing on maturity and financial stability as key factors. These aspects not only contribute to more considered decisions regarding marriage but also ensure a foundation for future familial success.

Firstly, maturity significantly influences the success of a marriage. By the age of 21, individuals are more likely to have completed their education and embarked on their career paths, allowing them to enter into marriage with a more developed sense of self and a clear purpose. This pivotal age provides a more expansive perspective on life and relationships, fostering enhanced decision-making capabilities. For instance, research consistently shows that marriages entered into after reaching the age of 21 exhibit a substantially lower risk of divorce, highlighting the critical importance of emotional and psychological readiness in fostering lasting relationships.

Secondly, financial stability plays a pivotal role in the success of a marriage. Opting to marry at or beyond the age of 21 increases the chances that both partners have attained a level of financial independence and security, which is crucial for navigating the economic aspects of married life effectively. Achieving this stability not only addresses the couple's immediate financial needs but also bolsters their ability to meet long-term aspirations, such as home ownership or family planning. Consequently, the stress and challenges that frequently stem from financial insecurity can be significantly reduced, paving the way for healthier, more resilient marital relationships.

In summary, setting the legal marriage age at 21 offers crucial advantages, enhancing both personal maturity and financial stability essential for lasting, successful unions. This approach not only prepares individuals better for marital commitments but also serves wider societal interests, fostering more resilient and happy family environments.

Download IELTS eBooks, get everything you need to achieve a high band score

Sample Essay 2

Debates surrounding the proposition to elevate the legal marriage age to 21 often pivot on critical societal and individual benefits. Advocating for this increase, my stance hinges on enhanced societal contribution and personal development as focal arguments. These elements are not merely beneficial but foundational for the prosperity of future families and the community at large.

Central to the discourse is the notion that delayed marriage facilitates greater societal contribution. At 21, individuals are better positioned to engage in social, educational, and civic activities, enriching their own lives and, by extension, their communities. This period of extended youth allows for participation in voluntary services, acquisition of higher education, and involvement in initiatives that foster civic responsibility. Such engagement cultivates well-rounded individuals who bring a wealth of experience and a broadened worldview into their marital life, thereby enhancing the fabric of society and promoting a culture of informed and active citizenship.

Moreover, postponing marriage until the age of 21 supports profound personal development, encompassing emotional intelligence, self-reliance, and a deepened understanding of personal values and life goals. The additional years provide a crucial window for individuals to explore their identity, pursue personal ambitions, and solidify their career paths without the added responsibilities and commitments marriage entails. This foundation of self-knowledge and independence is pivotal for entering into a marriage that is both fulfilling and resilient. It allows individuals to approach relationships with maturity, ensuring that their decisions are reflective of their true selves and aligned with their long-term aspirations, making for more stable and harmonious unions.

In synthesizing these arguments, it becomes clear that advocating for a legal marriage age of 21 is a stance rooted in the betterment of both individuals and society. The benefits of such a policy extend beyond the immediate couples to touch the very structure of our communities, fostering more engaged citizens and more stable, informed unions. Thus, this proposition is not merely a matter of personal preference but a strategic approach to nurturing healthier societies and more capable individuals.

Download IELTS eBooks, get everything you need to achieve a high band score

Sample Essay 3

The debate concerning the appropriate age for individuals to enter into matrimony has been a topic of contention in various societies across the globe. While some argue in favour of an individual's freedom to choose, others assert that a minimum age of 21 should be mandated for marriage. Although I appreciate the value of personal autonomy, I tend to lean towards endorsing a higher age limit due to its potential benefits to individuals and society as a whole.

The primary argument for delaying marriage is tied to the fact that the early twenties are a crucial period for personal development, further education, and the establishment of one's career. The responsibilities and complexities that accompany marriage can, in many instances, divert focus and resources away from these critical areas. In the United States, studies have found that individuals who marry in their early twenties or younger have a higher propensity to face financial instability and career stagnation as they juggle the dual demands of work and family.

In opposition to this view, proponents of a lower marriage age often cite personal liberties and cultural considerations. They argue that limiting the freedom to marry based on age is a breach of individual rights and freedoms. For instance, in many indigenous cultures worldwide, early marriages are common practice and part of the cultural fabric of the community. Despite the validity of these arguments, I posit that the societal benefits of a higher marriage age outweigh the potential infringement on personal liberties. A higher marriage age could potentially lead to more stable marriages, less divorce, and, as a result, more stable families and societies. It would allow individuals the opportunity to gain the necessary life experience, emotional maturity, and financial stability required to navigate the complexities of married life successfully.

In conclusion, while respecting the rights of individuals and the importance of cultural traditions, I stand by the belief that a minimum marriage age of 21 would serve individuals and society better. This period of personal growth and self-discovery enables individuals to enter into marriage as more mature and stable adults.

Sample Essay 4

In many jurisdictions worldwide, the legal age at which people can marry is often set below 21 years. However, there is a growing consensus among some sections of society advocating for this threshold to be raised to at least 21 years. I predominantly agree with this proposition, recognizing the myriad of benefits it could potentially confer upon young individuals intending to tie the matrimonial knot.

The primary reason that bolsters my viewpoint is the significance of personal and professional growth during early adulthood. It's well documented that individuals around the age of 20 are frequently immersed in higher education or are novices in the professional sphere. Engaging in marriage at such a critical juncture could inadvertently impose a substantial emotional and financial burden, thus hindering their ability to fully exploit these formative opportunities. For example, a young couple might prematurely forgo educational opportunities or career advancement, leading to potential regrets later in life.

Conversely, advocates against the imposition of a higher marriageable age often anchor their arguments in personal liberty and cultural traditions. From their perspective, setting an arbitrary age limit infringes upon the individual's freedom to make personal decisions. In Japan, for instance, the permissible age for marriage is 18 for men and 16 for women, reflecting a longstanding societal norm. Despite this, it's crucial to ponder upon the readiness and capability of such young individuals to handle the multifaceted challenges that marriage inevitably presents.

In conclusion, while respecting the counterarguments emphasizing personal freedom and cultural traditions, I firmly believe that raising the minimum marriage age to 21 could be advantageous. This age limit allows young adults ample time to mature emotionally, gain educational qualifications, and establish a firm footing in their career, thus preparing them adequately for the shared responsibilities that a successful marriage entails.

Get your personalised IELTS Essay Feedback from a former examiner

Download IELTS eBooks, get everything you need to achieve a high band score