top of page

People Should Never Eat Meat Because Raising Animals For Human Consumption Is Cruel - IELTS Essay


People Should Never Eat Meat Because Raising Animals For Human Consumption Is Cruel - IELTS Task 2 Band 9 Sample Essay

Get your personalised IELTS Essay Feedback from a former examiner


Download IELTS eBooks, get everything you need to achieve a high band score



Model Essay 1

The assertion that individuals should abstain from meat consumption due to the inherent cruelty in animal farming practices holds significant ethical weight. I firmly agree with this stance, as the moral implications of such cruelty cannot be justified by dietary preferences alone. This essay will delve into the ethical imperatives against animal cruelty and the ecological impacts of meat production, advocating for a shift towards plant-based diets.


Firstly, the standard practices in the meat industry often involve severe mistreatment of animals, raising substantial ethical concerns. Animals in many factory farms live in cramped conditions, suffer from lack of proper care, and endure painful procedures without anesthesia. For instance, chickens are often kept in cages so small that they cannot stretch their wings, and pigs are confined in pens that restrict any natural behavior, leading to physical and psychological distress. The moral argument against consuming meat is grounded in the principle of reducing suffering. By choosing not to consume meat, individuals directly contribute to decreasing the demand that drives these inhumane farming practices.


Additionally, the environmental degradation caused by the meat industry further supports the argument for adopting a plant-based diet. Livestock farming is a major contributor to deforestation, water pollution, and greenhouse gas emissions. Studies have shown that transitioning to plant-based diets can significantly lower one's carbon footprint and reduce the strain on global water and land resources. By abstaining from meat, individuals not only challenge the ethics of animal cruelty but also embrace a more sustainable lifestyle, crucial for the health of our planet.


In conclusion, the ethical and environmental issues associated with meat consumption provide compelling reasons to cease eating meat. By choosing plant-based alternatives, individuals can take a stand against cruelty and contribute to environmental sustainability, thereby aligning their actions with the principles of compassion and responsibility.


Download IELTS eBooks, get everything you need to achieve a high band score



Model Essay 2

The proposition that humans should altogether abstain from eating meat due to the cruelty associated with animal farming is one I firmly disagree with. While concerns regarding animal welfare are valid, they do not warrant a complete rejection of meat consumption but rather necessitate reforms in farming practices. This essay will discuss the necessity of meat in many diets and cultures, along with the feasibility of humane farming methods.


Nutritionally, meat plays a crucial role in the human diet, providing essential proteins, vitamins, and minerals that are less readily available in plant-based foods. For example, vitamin B12, crucial for nerve function and blood formation, is naturally found only in animal products. Many populations, especially in regions with limited access to diverse food sources, rely on meat as a staple. Completely eliminating meat from the diet without feasible alternatives could lead to nutritional deficiencies and health problems in large segments of the global population. Additionally, the bioavailability of nutrients like iron and zinc is significantly higher in meat than in plant sources, making it indispensable in many diets worldwide.


Moreover, it is possible to raise animals in a manner that respects their well-being, thereby mitigating ethical concerns. Innovations in farming techniques, such as enriched environments, proper veterinary care, and adherence to higher welfare standards, demonstrate that meat can be produced responsibly. Initiatives like the Certified Humane program show that with strict regulations and transparent practices, farming can be conducted ethically. Therefore, rather than abandoning meat consumption, supporting and scaling up humane practices is a more balanced approach. This approach not only ensures the ethical treatment of animals but also sustains agricultural communities and promotes ecological balance by maintaining biodiversity within farming systems.


In conclusion, while animal welfare in farming deserves attention, it does not justify a complete cessation of meat consumption. A balanced approach involving dietary choices that include ethically sourced meats and improved farming regulations can address animal welfare concerns without forgoing the nutritional benefits and cultural significance of meat in human diets.


Download IELTS eBooks, get everything you need to achieve a high band score



Model Essay 3

The debate over the ethicality of consuming meat due to the alleged cruelty of animal farming has sparked intense discussions. I assert that while the concerns are valid, a total prohibition on meat consumption overlooks the complexity of the issue. This essay will explore the nuances of animal welfare in farming practices and alternative sustainable farming methods that mitigate ethical concerns.


Animal welfare activists argue that conventional methods of raising animals for food often involve inhumane conditions, such as overcrowding, poor nutrition, and lack of veterinary care, which undoubtedly amount to cruelty. Factory farming, prevalent for its economic efficiency, frequently subjects animals to severe distress, leading to a strong ethical argument against meat consumption. The physical and psychological pain endured by these animals is documented extensively, demonstrating that current practices can indeed be cruel. However, this argument against meat consumption simplifies the broader implications of such a stance. Not all farming practices are cruel; there are numerous examples of ethical farming where animals are raised in free-range environments, provided with good health care, and allowed to exhibit natural behaviours. These practices, often certified by animal welfare standards like the RSPCA's Assured scheme or organic certifications, suggest that meat can be produced responsibly without cruelty.


Moreover, the complete elimination of meat consumption could have severe socioeconomic impacts, particularly in less industrialized areas where livestock farming is not only a source of food but also of economic livelihood. Recent advancements in agricultural technology present promising alternatives such as lab-grown meat, which can potentially reduce the need for traditional animal farming and thus, the associated ethical concerns. This innovative approach involves cultivating meat from animal cells in a controlled environment, eliminating the need for killing animals, and could be a significant ethical and sustainable alternative to conventional meat. Such developments suggest that rather than eliminating meat consumption altogether, supporting responsible consumption and technological innovation could provide a balanced solution to ethical concerns while maintaining cultural and economic viability.


In conclusion, while the concerns about cruelty in meat production are justified, they do not necessitate a total cessation of meat consumption. Ethical farming practices and technological innovations provide viable pathways to reduce cruelty in meat production.


Get your personalised IELTS Essay Feedback from a former examiner


Download IELTS eBooks, get everything you need to achieve a high band score

Comments


bottom of page