top of page

Most Fiction Writers Do Not Earn Enough Money to Live Off Their Writing - IELTS Band 9 Essay


Most Fiction Writers Do Not Earn Enough Money to Live Off Their Writing - IELTS Band 9 Essay


Get your personalised IELTS Essay Feedback from a former examiner


Download IELTS eBooks, get everything you need to achieve a high band score



Model Essay 1

The financial struggle faced by many fiction writers is a topic of significant debate, with some advocating for government support to sustain literary quality. I firmly believe in providing such assistance, as it not only preserves cultural heritage but also fosters societal growth through literature. This essay will explore the benefits of government aid for writers and its broader cultural implications.


Firstly, government funding can be a lifeline for writers, enabling them to focus on their craft without the looming worry of financial insecurity. The creative process is often lengthy and unpredictable, with many writers dedicating years to their manuscripts. By offering grants or stipends, governments can ensure that writers are not forced to abandon promising literary projects for more lucrative work. For example, the Arts Council in the UK provides grants that have supported authors like Zadie Smith, whose critically acclaimed novels might not have been possible without such financial backing. These initiatives not only sustain authors financially but also allow them to explore creative depths without haste, producing more thoughtful and profound literature.


Moreover, supporting fiction writers can significantly enrich a nation's cultural landscape. Literature is a mirror reflecting societal values, challenges, and aspirations; it fosters empathy, broadens perspectives, and promotes critical thinking. When writers are supported, they produce works that provoke thought and discussion, contributing to a more informed and engaged public. The success of government-funded literary festivals and book fairs globally underscores the public's appetite for accessible literature, further justifying the investment in its creators. Such support not only preserves diverse literary voices but also ensures that literature continues to be an accessible tool for education and cultural dialogue, enhancing societal well-being.


In conclusion, the benefits of providing financial assistance to fiction writers extend far beyond the individuals themselves; they enhance the cultural and intellectual richness of society as a whole. By investing in writers, governments invest in the preservation and evolution of their cultural heritage, ensuring that it continues to inspire and educate future generations.


Download IELTS eBooks, get everything you need to achieve a high band score



Model Essay 2

While some argue that the government should financially support fiction writers to encourage literary excellence, I contend that such measures are neither effective nor justifiable. Instead, the literary market should determine which works merit publication and success based on quality and public appeal. This essay will discuss the drawbacks of government intervention in the literary arts and the benefits of a market-driven approach to literature.


Firstly, government funding for fiction writers risks promoting mediocrity by providing financial safety nets regardless of literary merit. When writers are guaranteed income, there is a potential decrease in the incentive to innovate or produce compelling narratives. For example, in countries where extensive subsidies for the arts are provided, there is often a saturation of mediocre works that fail to make any significant cultural impact. This creates an environment where true talent may be overshadowed by those who are merely proficient at navigating the grant application process, rather than crafting outstanding literary works. Consequently, this system may not only discourage genuine effort but also divert resources away from writers who could truly benefit from such support due to exceptional talent.


Furthermore, government assistance for writers can lead to biased and unbalanced support, where only those who align with prevailing political or cultural narratives receive funding. This can stifle true artistic expression and diversity in literature, as authors may feel compelled to cater to specific themes or viewpoints that are favourably viewed by funding bodies. The vitality of literature lies in its diversity and the capacity to challenge societal norms, which is compromised when funding is allocated through potentially partisan or restrictive channels. Such conditions can create a literary echo chamber that diminishes the role of literature as a tool for social reflection and change, thereby reducing its overall impact on society.


In conclusion, while supporting literature is important, government financial aid for fiction writers is not the solution. Such interventions can stifle genuine talent and diversity in literary expression, leading instead to a homogenized cultural landscape. The literary market should drive the success of writers, ensuring that only the most compelling and culturally valuable works rise to prominence.


Get your personalised IELTS Essay Feedback from a former examiner


Download IELTS eBooks, get everything you need to achieve a high band score

Comments


bottom of page