Advantages and Disadvantages of Building Schools Colleges and Universities in Residential Areas - IELTS Task 2 Band 9 Sample Essays

Achieve your dream score with our detailed IELTS eBooks - your complete guide!

Sample Essay 1

Authorities often choose to construct schools, colleges, and universities within residential districts, a decision that carries significant implications for both families and neighbourhoods. Such institutions can offer greater accessibility for students, encourage stronger parental involvement, and stimulate local businesses. At the same time, they may intensify traffic congestion, disrupt residential tranquillity, and heighten housing pressures. Each of these dimensions illustrates how the benefits and drawbacks of this practice are closely intertwined.

Locating educational institutions within neighbourhoods primarily strengthens access, engagement and local vitality. Shorter journeys reduce lateness and fatigue, particularly for younger pupils, and free time for homework, rest and enrichment. Parents can attend meetings and extracurricular events without prohibitive travel, enhancing home–school collaboration. Facilities—libraries, sports courts and auditoriums—often open to the public, cultivating a civic commons that supports adult learning and intergenerational programmes. Proximity also encourages a modal shift from cars to walking and cycling, trimming household costs, congestion and emissions. For post-secondary campuses, everyday proximity to cafés, copy centres and tutoring services sustains small enterprises, while internships with nearby firms arise organically from frequent contact, knitting education into the neighbourhood’s economic fabric.

However, embedding large student populations in residential zones imposes significant costs in congestion, noise and housing pressure. School start and finish times concentrate traffic onto narrow streets, heightening collision risk for pedestrians and cyclists and frustrating residents. Playgrounds, assemblies and evening events can undermine quiet enjoyment, particularly in dense districts with limited acoustic buffering. Universities intensify these pressures: “studentification” can elevate rents, displace long-term tenants and alter retail mixes toward late-night economies. Large footprints may consume scarce green space, overshadow adjacent homes and strain utilities and waste systems. Where land assembly is aggressive, communities can lose heritage buildings or informal play areas, eroding neighbourhood identity and cohesion.

In summary, residential siting enhances educational access, parental involvement and local economic dynamism, yet it can simultaneously degrade mobility, tranquillity and affordability. The overall impact turns on scale, density and design quality, as well as how traffic, noise and housing demand are distributed and managed.

Achieve your dream score with our detailed IELTS eBooks - your complete guide!

Sample Essay 2

Building educational institutions in residential areas has become a common feature of urban development, bringing opportunities as well as complications. Proximity to schools and universities can improve educational equity, promote healthier commuting, and enrich the social fabric of communities. Yet the presence of large student populations may also overload infrastructure, create persistent noise, and unsettle the balance of local housing markets. These contrasting outcomes reveal the complex impact of such planning decisions.

The chief advantage of residential siting is that it promotes educational equity and a culture of lifelong learning. When schools and campuses lie within a ten-minute walk, attendance improves, fatigue falls and participation in clubs and remedial sessions increases, particularly for low-income families without private transport. Community-facing libraries, makerspaces and sports facilities extend learning beyond the school day, while neighbourhood events—public lectures, exhibitions, school fairs—animate streets and squares. Nearby institutions can stabilise property markets by attracting steady employment and fostering micro-enterprises that serve students and staff, thereby diversifying local economies and supporting safer, more active streets through constant footfall.

By contrast, the principal disadvantage is the cumulative strain on residential amenity, infrastructure and social balance. Peak-hour drop-offs and pick-ups generate recurring gridlock, idling emissions and curb conflicts, and parking spillover can crowd out residents. Sound from playgrounds, PA systems and evening performances carries through compact blocks, while delivery trucks and waste collections add to disturbance. In university districts, high student demand can inflate short-term rents, convert family housing into shared units and accelerate turnover, undermining neighbourly ties. Large institutional parcels may introduce impermeable superblocks, lengthening walking routes and severing historic pathways, while intensive lighting and surveillance can make streets feel over-managed rather than welcoming.

Overall, residential campuses can broaden access and embed learning in daily life, yet they can also erode quiet, mobility and community stability. Outcomes depend on context—plot size, street capacity and local housing markets—and on how effectively competing needs are balanced in practice.

Achieve your dream score with our detailed IELTS eBooks - your complete guide!