top of page

Car-free Days are Effective Ways to Reduce Air Pollution.

Write about the following topic:


Some people believe that car-free days are effective ways to reduce air pollution. However, others argue that there are other ways that are more effective.

Discuss both views and give your own opinion.


Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge and experiences.


You should write at least 250 words.


IELTS Task 2 Band 9 Sample Essay prompt "Some people believe that car-free days are effective ways to reduce air pollution. However, others argue that there are other ways that are more effective. Discuss both views and give your own opinion."


Get your personalised IELTS Essay Feedback from a former examiner


Download IELTS eBooks, get everything you need to achieve a high band score



Sample Essay 1

The debate surrounding the efficacy of car-free days in mitigating air pollution is multifaceted, with some advocating for their potential benefits, while others suggest alternative solutions may prove more effective. This essay will explore both perspectives, ultimately arguing in favor of a holistic approach that includes car-free days among a suite of measures to tackle air quality issues.


Proponents of car-free days argue that they serve as a powerful symbol of environmental commitment, offering immediate, albeit temporary, relief from the scourge of vehicular emissions. Cities like Paris and Bogotá have witnessed notable improvements in air quality during such events, underlining their potential as part of broader environmental strategies. Moreover, these initiatives encourage community engagement and foster a culture of sustainability, highlighting the role of individual actions in combating climate change.


Conversely, critics contend that the impact of car-free days is superficial, advocating for more sustained and systemic solutions. They point to the advancement of electric vehicle technology and improved public transportation infrastructure as more effective in achieving long-term reductions in air pollution. Additionally, there is an argument to be made for stricter emissions regulations and the promotion of green urban planning as means to address the root causes of air pollution, rather than its symptoms.


In my opinion, while car-free days are beneficial in raising awareness and temporarily improving air quality, they should not be viewed as a standalone solution. A comprehensive approach, incorporating technological innovation, regulatory reform, and public engagement, is essential to effect meaningful change. By combining the symbolic power of car-free days with substantive policy measures, we can work towards a cleaner, healthier future for our cities and their inhabitants.


In conclusion, the debate on the effectiveness of car-free days in reducing air pollution is not binary. While these initiatives offer valuable benefits, their impact must be bolstered by a range of sustainable practices and policies. Ultimately, the path to improved air quality lies in embracing a multifaceted approach that addresses both the symptoms and underlying causes of environmental degradation.


Download IELTS eBooks, get everything you need to achieve a high band score



Sample Essay 2

Air pollution poses a significant global challenge that demands efficient mitigation strategies. While proponents advocate for the effectiveness of car-free days in reducing pollution, opponents argue for the implementation of more comprehensive measures. This essay critically examines both viewpoints to highlight the importance of integrating diverse strategies to combat air pollution and proposes that a combination of car-free days, sustainable transportation, renewable energy transitions, and green urban planning will yield the most effective results.


Car-free days undeniably contribute to reducing air pollution. Statistics indicate that an average car emits approximately 123g of carbon dioxide per kilometer. By restricting vehicle circulation for even a single day, a significant reduction in CO2 emissions can be achieved. For instance, Jakarta, Indonesia, has successfully implemented a weekly car-free day, resulting in improved air quality. These initiatives encourage individuals to explore alternative modes of transportation, such as cycling, walking, or using public transport, thereby reducing reliance on private vehicles and decreasing pollutant emissions.


However, it is crucial to acknowledge that car-free days alone cannot fully address the complex issue of air pollution. Fossil fuel extraction, combustion, and deforestation make substantial contributions to air pollution, accounting for at least 50% of the problem. Therefore, a comprehensive strategy should encompass reducing reliance on fossil fuels, transitioning to sustainable energy sources, and implementing stricter regulations on deforestation. For example, countries investing in renewable energy infrastructure have experienced significant reductions in air pollution levels, simultaneously addressing climate change concerns. Moreover, adopting sustainable urban planning practices, such as promoting green spaces and optimizing transportation networks, can further contribute to mitigating air pollution.


In conclusion, addressing air pollution requires a multi-faceted approach that combines the benefits of car-free days with broader strategies. Governments should prioritize the integration of various measures, including sustainable transportation, renewable energy transitions, and green urban planning, to achieve a substantial and sustainable reduction in air pollution levels.


Download IELTS eBooks, get everything you need to achieve a high band score



Sample Essay 3

The international discourse on sustainable practices continually returns to the crux of "car-free days" and their efficacy in curbing air pollution. Supporters posit that instituting days without vehicles dramatically attenuates air pollution, whereas dissenters argue for alternative, and purportedly superior, methods. This essay believes that while car-free days provide a demonstrable immediate impact on reducing air pollution, they should be viewed as a component of a broader, more holistic approach to environmental conservation, rather than a standalone solution.


The proposition that "car-free days are effective ways to reduce air pollution" enjoys a considerable degree of support. It is anchored on the fact that automobiles, particularly those running on fossil fuels, are significant contributors to air pollution. According to the World Health Organization, around 91% of the world's population lives in places where air quality levels exceed their guidelines, with vehicular emissions being a primary factor. By designating certain days as car-free, cities can drastically cut down on carbon emissions. Examples such as Bogotá, Colombia, where a weekly car-free day was implemented, show a significant reduction in air pollution levels, underlining the potency of this approach.


Conversely, a contrary school of thought emphasises the potential of other measures that could yield even greater results. One such alternative is the adoption of renewable energy for transportation. Electric cars, powered by wind, solar, or hydroelectric energy, have the potential to eliminate the carbon footprint of vehicles altogether. More than merely reducing air pollution, this could also stimulate economic growth by creating jobs in the renewable energy sector. Furthermore, critics of car-free days argue that they merely shift the burden of pollution to other days, resulting in no net decrease in emissions.


In my opinion, while car-free days can indeed be a potent tool in the fight against air pollution, they should be complemented with other measures for a more holistic solution. Promoting public transportation and cycling, as well as investing in renewable energy and green infrastructure, will provide a more long-term and sustainable solution. Car-free days are a step in the right direction, but they are not a panacea; they should form part of a comprehensive suite of strategies.


In conclusion, while car-free days can provide a tangible immediate impact, the adoption of renewable energy sources and sustainable transportation infrastructure can offer more long-term benefits.


Get your personalised IELTS Essay Feedback from a former examiner


Download IELTS eBooks, get everything you need to achieve a high band score

Comments


bottom of page