top of page

Some People Think It is Better to Choose Friends Who Always Have Same Opinion - IELTS Task 2 Essay

You should spend about 40 minutes on this task.

Write about the following topic:

Some people think it’s better to choose friends who always have same opinion as them. Other people believe that it is good to have friends who some time disagree with them.

Discuss both these views and give your opinions.

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge and experiences.

You should write at least 250 words.

Task 2 Band 9 Sample Essay (It’s better to choose friends who always have same opinion.)

Get your personalised IELTS Essay Feedback from a former examiner

Download IELTS eBooks, get everything you need to achieve a high band score

Model Essay 1

In the realm of friendships, opinions diverge on whether it is more advantageous to associate with those who always concur or with those who occasionally dissent. This essay posits that a blend of both perspectives fosters the most enriching relationships, arguing that concord nurtures comfort, while disagreement encourages growth.

Proponents of homogeneous friendships argue that they offer a sanctuary of agreement, minimizing conflict and fostering a tranquil environment conducive to mental peace. Such relationships are built on mutual validation, where each individual feels deeply understood and supported, a sentiment crucial for emotional well-being. In these circles, shared perspectives reinforce a sense of belonging, amplifying the comfort derived from common understanding. For instance, friends who share identical views on pivotal life decisions can offer unwavering reinforcement during moments of doubt, thus significantly strengthening the bonds of friendship and ensuring a harmonious support system.

Conversely, friendships that thrive on diversity of thought challenge individuals to reassess their perspectives, promoting personal development and fostering a dynamic exchange of ideas. Engaging in healthy debates with friends who offer differing viewpoints not only broadens one's horizon but also enhances critical thinking and empathy, making such interactions invaluable. This process of reflection and discussion encourages open-mindedness and adaptability. For example, a person with a fixed stance on a controversial issue might attain a more nuanced understanding after discussing it with a dissenting friend, thereby fostering intellectual growth, resilience, and a deeper appreciation for the complexity of human thought and experience.

In conclusion, while the comfort of agreement in friendships is undeniably appealing, the dynamic challenge presented by dissenting opinions is equally vital for personal development. A balance between harmonious support and constructive disagreement cultivates a friendship that is not only comforting but also intellectually stimulating and growth-oriented, thereby embodying the best of both worlds.

Download IELTS eBooks, get everything you need to achieve a high band score

Model Essay 2

The debate between fostering friendships grounded in unanimous agreement versus valuing those ripe with diverse viewpoints is a multifaceted one. This essay advocates for a nuanced approach, positing that while shared beliefs provide solace, divergent opinions are the crucible for personal and intellectual growth.

On one hand, friendships based on uniform opinions offer a reassuring echo chamber where individuals find solace and validation. In these relationships, there is a profound sense of camaraderie and mutual understanding, creating a bedrock for emotional security. When navigating the turbulent waters of life's uncertainties, such friends act as anchors, offering solace through their unwavering agreement and support. For instance, during life-altering decisions like career changes or marital choices, the concordant opinions of friends can serve as a guiding light, instilling confidence and decisiveness.

On the contrary, engaging with friends who often dissent introduces a dynamic interplay of ideas, pushing boundaries and fostering an environment ripe for personal evolution. This diversity of perspectives forces one to confront their biases, hone their argumentative skills, and develop a deeper empathy towards differing viewpoints. It is in the crucible of disagreement that one's convictions are tested and refined. For example, exposure to alternate opinions on societal norms can catalyze a more comprehensive understanding of complex issues, enriching one's worldview and promoting a more empathetic societal interaction.

In summation, while homogeneous friendships provide comfort and validation, it is the heterogeneity of perspectives within friendships that catalyzes growth, understanding, and resilience. Embracing both aspects yields a more rounded and fulfilling interpersonal experience, underscoring the beauty of diversity in human connections.

Download IELTS eBooks, get everything you need to achieve a high band score

Sample Essay 3

There is a group of people who believe that like-minded friends are better than the ones who hold different opinions, whereas others argue that it is better to have some friends who might come up with diverse views in various issues. Though an unconditional agreement among friends can bring a fast result, in my opinion, the most efficient and innovative outcomes arise from the ideas of opposing viewpoints.

As likeminded friends are ready to give their consensus views, a strong support and an expected result come incredibly fast. Moreover, when there is a unanimous view, the chance of argument is very low, which eventually leads to a long-term friendship. There is an assertion that people with the same opinion easily jell up with each other, form a better team and bring a fast outcome. For example, while deciding holiday spots or restaurants, like minded friends could reach the unanimous agreements without any time-consuming discussion process.

However, the other segment of society believes that people who occasionally have disagreement with their peers, can generate smarter outcomes by blending their diverse points of view. In other words, when a dispute arises among friends, it creates a positive atmosphere of discussion which leads to think from different angles toward a better decision. In fact, if I encounter some difficulties or require some suggestions, I will consult with friends who viable alternative solutions, rather than sticking to my view. Studies also depict that the diverse viewpoints bring a sustainable friendship, as they benefit all in the group.

In conclusion, I strongly believe that either of the friends could have their own functions in life, since none can supersede another one. Therefore, I reaffirm my position that one should make diverse friends to enrich their life.

Get your personalised IELTS Essay Feedback from a former examiner

Download IELTS eBooks, get everything you need to achieve a high band score


Couldn’t Load Comments
It looks like there was a technical problem. Try reconnecting or refreshing the page.
bottom of page