How Dangerous Waste Products are Dealt with in Three Countries - IELTS Task 1 Multiple Graphs Band 9

You should spend 20 minutes on this task.

The pie charts below show how dangerous waste products are dealt with in three countries.

Summarize the information by selecting and reporting main features and make comparisons where relevant.

Write at least 150 words.

Get your Detailed Essay Feedback from an IELTS Examiner

Get our downloadable eBooks, learn the details how to write a high band essay

Task 1 Multiple Graphs Band 9 Sample Report (1)

The given charts present a comparison among three countries - Korea, Sweden and the UK, in terms of their respective methodologies for disposing of harmful waste.

Overall, the comparison shows that the UK lags significantly behind Sweden and Korea in recycling hazardous waste, with a disproportionate reliance on landfill sites. Meanwhile, Korea has established itself as a leader in waste recycling, and Sweden takes a more diversified approach, with a mix of recycling and incineration for disposing of hazardous waste.

Both Sweden and the UK primarily bury their hazardous waste underground, while Korea focuses on recycling. A closer analysis reveals that in the UK, a staggering 82% of harmful waste is disposed of in landfill sites, which is higher than the figure of 55% in Sweden and just 22% in Korea, which heavily relies on recycling, with 69% of hazardous materials being recycled, a rate much higher than the other two nations.

In terms of recycling hazardous waste, Sweden fares better than the UK, with 25% of its hazardous waste being recycled. In contrast, the UK does not recycle any of its harmful waste and opts for chemical treatment or dumping waste at sea. These two methods are not employed in Korea or Sweden, with both countries preferring incineration for 9% and 20% of their dangerous waste, respectively.

Get our downloadable eBooks, learn the details how to write a high band essay

Task 1 Multiple Graphs Band 9 Sample Report (2)

The presented charts provide a comparison of Korea, Sweden, and the UK in terms of their hazardous waste disposal methods.

Overall, the charts demonstrate that Korea's waste disposal methods are more sustainable and environmentally friendly than those of the UK and Sweden. While the UK and Sweden bury the majority of their dangerous waste products underground, Korea opts for recycling, which results in a much lower amount of waste ending up in landfill sites. Sweden has a diverse approach to hazardous waste disposal, with a mix of recycling and incineration, while the UK lags behind in hazardous waste recycling.

Both Sweden and the UK rely heavily on burying their hazardous waste products underground, while Korea has adopted a more sustainable approach by recycling most of its hazardous materials. A closer inspection reveals that in the UK, a significant 82% of dangerous waste is deposited in landfill sites, while Sweden uses this method for 55% of its harmful waste. In contrast, Korea employs this technique for only 22% of its similar waste and instead has a remarkable 69% recycling rate of hazardous materials, far higher than the other two nations.

Sweden leads the way in recycling hazardous waste, with a quarter of its dangerous waste being recycled. On the other hand, the UK does not recycle any of its hazardous waste and relies on chemical treatment or dumping waste at sea. These methods are not practiced in Korea or Sweden, which prefer incineration for 9% and 20% of their dangerous waste, respectively.

IELTS Task 1 Multiple Graphs Band 8.5 Sample Report

The provided pie charts offer an insight into how three countries, namely Sweden, England, and the Republic of Korea, manage their hazardous waste using five unique techniques.

Overall, while the three nations adopt distinct methods, incineration and underground burial are the two most commonly employed waste management strategies. However, the United Kingdom stands alone in utilizing dumping in seawater as a waste management approach.

Commencing with the United Kingdom, the majority of its hazardous waste, at 82 percent, is buried underground, while dumping in seawater and chemical treatment constitute 8 percent each, with a mere 2 percent disposed of via incineration. By contrast, incineration accounts for 9 percent and 20 percent of the Republic of Korea and Sweden's waste, respectively, with neither country utilizing chemical treatment in their waste management systems.

On the other hand, a significant proportion of waste, specifically 55 percent in Sweden and 69 percent in the Republic of Korea, is managed by burying it underground and recycling. However, Sweden recycles a quarter of its waste, while a similar ratio of garbage is disposed of underground in the Republic of Korea.

IELTS Task 1 Multiple Graphs Band 8 Sample Report

The given pie charts illustrate how the three countries, namely Sweden, England, and the Republic of Korea, manage their deleterious waste using five distinct methods.

Overall, though the three nations are completely different in terms of their dominant strategies, incineration and underground are the common options used by all the three countries. However, the UK is the only nation that involves dumping in the seawater as its one of the waste management approaches.

To begin with the United Kingdom, a vast majority (82 percent) of its hazardous waste is buried beneath the earth, while dumping in the sea and treating by chemical account for 8 percent each, leaving only 2 percent for vanishing by fire. Conversely, 9 and 20 percent of waste in the Republic of Korea and Sweden, correspondingly, go for incineration, and none of these nations use chemical treatment for their garbage management system.

On the other hand, dominant shares of waste which are 55 percent of Sweden and 69 percent of the Republic of Korea, respectively, are managed by burying beneath the earth surface and recycling. However, Sweden reprocesses one fourth of its waste, while roughly the same ratio of garbage goes under the ground in the Republic of Korea.

Get your Detailed Essay Feedback from an IELTS Examiner

Get our downloadable eBooks, learn the details how to write a high band essay