top of page

Governments Should Ban Dangerous Sports, or People Should Have Freedom of Activities - Task 2 Band 9

Updated: Mar 18

You should spend about 40 minutes on this task.


Write about the following topic:


Some people think that governments should ban dangerous sports, while others think people should have freedom to do any sports or activity.

Discuss both views and give your own Opinion.


Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge and experiences.


You should write at least 250 words.


Task 2 Band 9 Essay Sample Answer

Get your personalised IELTS Essay Feedback from a former examiner


Download IELTS eBooks, get everything you need to achieve a high band score



Model Essay 1

The contentious issue of whether governments should restrict dangerous sports pits the importance of public safety against the sanctity of individual freedom. Advocating for a harmonious resolution, this essay will delve into the necessity of protective measures and the virtues of personal choice, aiming to demonstrate that a judicious blend of regulation and liberty can safeguard participants while respecting their autonomy to engage in risk-laden activities.


Proponents of governmental intervention in dangerous sports argue that the inherent risks, such as those in extreme mountaineering or motorsports, demand oversight to prevent fatalities and serious injuries. They highlight the societal cost of emergency responses and medical care, asserting that thoughtful regulation can alleviate these burdens. For example, the introduction of mandatory safety gear and comprehensive training programs could significantly diminish life-threatening incidents, illustrating how proactive safety measures can bolster participant security without necessitating outright bans. Additionally, such regulations could promote a culture of safety, encouraging more people to participate with confidence in these activities.


On the flip side, supporters of unrestricted access to sports champion individual autonomy, stressing the importance of personal responsibility and the right to assess one's own risk tolerance. They contend that engaging in high-risk activities often leads to unparalleled senses of accomplishment, resilience, and personal growth, which are difficult to achieve in less challenging environments. The ethos of adventure sports, characterized by participants willingly embracing risks for the thrill and challenge, exemplifies this viewpoint. Furthermore, the economic benefits accruing from tourism and professional competitions in these sectors highlight the importance of preserving such freedoms. Advocates argue that these activities not only support local economies but also enrich cultural diversity and global competitiveness in the sporting arena.


In conclusion, though safety in extreme sports is crucial, outright bans impinge on personal freedoms. A balanced approach, incorporating stringent safety measures and education, best ensures participants' well-being without curtailing their liberty to engage in such pursuits, aligning public safety with individual rights.


Download IELTS eBooks, get everything you need to achieve a high band score



Model Essay 2

The ongoing debate over regulating perilous sports strikes a chord between safeguarding public welfare and championing individual rights. This discourse posits that while ensuring safety is paramount, the essence of personal freedom cannot be overshadowed. By examining the merits of both government oversight and the preservation of autonomy, this essay endorses a nuanced stance that values both safety protocols and the liberty to engage in such sports.


Advocates for regulation argue that the unpredictable nature of dangerous sports warrants government intervention. They underscore the tragedy of accidents in activities like base jumping and bull running, where the thrill can swiftly turn fatal. The proponents of this view suggest that structured regulations, such as mandatory safety courses and equipment checks, could drastically lower these risks. A pertinent example is the regulated skydiving industry, which, despite its inherent dangers, has seen a decrease in accidents due to stringent safety standards and mandatory training sessions. Such measures demonstrate that risk can be managed effectively without eliminating the sport altogether.


Contrastingly, champions of unbridled access to sports argue that such pursuits are fundamental expressions of freedom and personal challenge. They emphasize the transformative power of confronting danger, citing the personal growth experienced by individuals who climb Everest or surf giant waves. These experiences, they argue, are invaluable, fostering resilience and self-awareness. Moreover, they highlight the economic impact of adventure sports, which contribute significantly to local economies through tourism and events. The success of community-based initiatives in remote areas, where adventure sports have revitalized local economies, stands as a testament to the positive ripple effects of maintaining open access to these activities.


In sum, while the concerns for safety in extreme sports are legitimate, outright prohibitions compromise individual freedom and stifle potential benefits. A balanced approach, emphasizing enhanced safety measures alongside the safeguarding of personal liberties, presents a pragmatic solution. Such a stance not only ensures participant safety but also respects the intrinsic human desire for adventure and self-discovery.


Download IELTS eBooks, get everything you need to achieve a high band score



Sample Essay 3

As extreme sports have grown in popularity, many individuals contend that it is bad policy for the government to forbid risky athletic events. The freedom to engage in hobbies may be compromised if all harmful activities are outlawed, despite the fact that the government has absolutely no influence whatsoever over the sports that people choose to engage in on their own leisure.


First off, since life is the most important resource, the government should step in if there is a sports event that poses a risk to spectators while also posing a hazard to players. This is true even if doing so limits one's freedom. For instance, fighting competitions should be outlawed because they promote violence and a very primitive outlook on life. How can seeing two people choke, punch, and slam each other to death be entertaining? Fighting should be restricted to the gym as a form of exercise and self-defence alone. Restricting individuals from participating in this type of activity can lower their risk of suffering lasting injuries in sports-related mishaps.


Nobody can, however, definitively determine if a sport is risky enough to be outlawed. It is unreasonable to forbid a certain sport by policy since every sport has a particular set of skills that must be mastered, and each person is capable of handling them differently. For instance, climbing Mount Everest is typically viewed as a perilous activity, but for a professional mountain tracker with experience climbing difficult mountains, it may just be a casual hobby. Therefore, rather than outlawing certain sports, the government should create workable alternatives like safety regulations and particular licenses for extreme sports.


The question of whether governments should forbid risky sports is debatable because it is their responsibility to control high-risk activities in order to protect the public from serious injury. Regarding individual freedom, it should be up to the individual whether they want to engage or not in risky sports, provided that they are proficient and fully aware of the hazards involved.

Get your personalised IELTS Essay Feedback from a former examiner


Download IELTS eBooks, get everything you need to achieve a high band score

0 comments

Comments

Rated 0 out of 5 stars.
No ratings yet

Add a rating
bottom of page