You should spend about 40 minutes on this task.
Write about the following topic:
Some feel that individuals should have the right to strike in all jobs while others feel there are exceptions.
Discuss both sides and give your own opinion.
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge and experiences.
You should write at least 250 words.
Get your Detailed Essay Feedback from an IELTS Examiner
Get our downloadable eBooks, learn the details how to write a high band essay
IELTS Task 2 Band 9 Sample Essay
The debate over whether all workers should have the right to strike or if there should be exceptions for certain critical positions has been ongoing. Although some individuals advocate for the universal right of all employees to go on strike to express their grievances, exceptions must be made for workers in critical positions such as firefighters and doctors due to the potential negative consequences on public safety. I will delve deeper into this concept in the essay.
Advocates of the former perspective posit that employees possess the inherent right to engage in strikes against their employers if they feel dissatisfied. The paramount objective appears to be the ability to articulate their grievances and apprehensions when their employers fail to take timely action. It is axiomatic that the lower the remuneration of workers, the higher the likelihood of job-related setbacks. Hence, striking workers aim to secure concessions from their employers by demanding higher wages, better working conditions, and reduced working hours. Striking, therefore, constitutes a practical and feasible means for employees to assert their rights and voice their concerns. For example, in my country, Azerbaijan, schoolteachers organized a strike and assembled outside school premises, clamouring for a raise in their meagre salaries, which prompted the school administration to revise their policies and accede to their demands. Nonetheless, it is not tenable to assume that every worker in every job can initiate a strike.
Given the vast array of professions worldwide, it would be futile to persuade every worker to stage a protest at their workplaces with the hope of obtaining concessions. The primary reason is that individuals who earn their livelihood as firefighters or doctors and opt to participate in collective action cannot be deemed responsible workers from an ethical standpoint. Indeed, their jobs play a crucial role in safeguarding human lives. Picturing a blazing inferno or a child in a life-threatening situation contradicts the notion of those who believe in the feasibility of strikes. Although workers have the natural right to strike, according to the National Labour Act, their decisions can lead to grief, despair, or even the death of innocent individuals.
In conclusion, although the right to strike is vital for workers to voice their concerns and advocate for improved work conditions, it is imperative to acknowledge the inherent risks associated with certain critical positions, such as those of firefighters and doctors, and make appropriate exceptions to safeguard public safety.
Get our downloadable eBooks, learn the details how to write a high band essay
IELTS Task 2 Band 8 Sample Essay
Since there has been a conflict between workers and management, some people are of the opinion that each person should have the right to go on strike regardless of their job, while others believe in the existence of exceptions. I will introduce both perspectives in support of the latter.
Proponents of the former view claim that employees have the right to strike against their workplaces if they are dissatisfied. The most important aspect appears to be being able to express their dissatisfaction as well as their concerns when their employers do not take action on time. It goes without saying that the less workers earn, the more work-related setbacks occur, meaning that striking employees desire to gain concessions from their bosses by increasing their wages, providing them with high-quality work conditions, and reducing lengthy working hours. Striking is therefore a viable and pragmatic way to enable employees to defend their rights and speak out. For instance, in my country, Azerbaijan, school teachers went on strike and congregated outside the school building, requesting to raise their low salaries, which resulted in having our school administrations shift their policy and accept the change. However, it does not necessarily mean that every single labourer in each job is able to commence a strike.
Considering the limitless number of jobs all around the world, it would be futile to convince everyone to rebel at their workplaces in hope of demanding concessions. The foremost reason is that people who earn their money by working as a firefighter or a doctor and opt to engage in concerted activities cannot ethically be considered responsible workers. In fact, their jobs play a crucially important role in people's lives. Imagining a burning house or a child in a fatal situation contrasts with the ones who believe in the likelihood of striking. Even though workers have the natural right to be on strike, according to the National Labour Act, their decisions may either lead to sorrow and grief or the death of an innocent child. Hence, working individuals ought to find out various ways to deal with work problems, and I would argue that there is an influx of options for anyone who desires positive changes at work.
In conclusion, while I acknowledge the advantage of having rights in terms of all workers going on strike, I believe that seeking different solutions will be a far better choice.
Get your Detailed Essay Feedback from an IELTS Examiner
Get our downloadable eBooks, learn the details how to write a high band essay