It Is Better for Children to Grow Up in The Countryside Than in A Big City - IELTS Band 9 Essay Samples

Achieve your dream score with our detailed IELTS eBooks - your complete guide!

Sample Essay 1

Although rural childhoods evoke safety and simplicity, I disagree that the countryside is better than a big city for raising children. On balance, cities offer a probabilistic advantage. They concentrate educational and social capital that compound over time, and—despite real risks—urban infrastructure fosters health, autonomy, and multicultural fluency that prepare young people for contemporary life. I will discuss these advantages through learning ecosystems and independence-building environments.

First, the density of educational and social capital in cities generates compounding returns for development. Daily proximity to libraries, museums, science centres, conservatories, and university-linked outreach transforms curiosity into skill because practice becomes routine rather than exceptional. A teenager can join a robotics club near a campus makerspace, attend Saturday math circles, and compete in debate tournaments across town—each activity sharpening reasoning, expression, and resilience. Diverse peer networks amplify these gains: encountering classmates from varied languages and livelihoods stretches vocabulary, empathy, and code-switching. Even when a neighbourhood school is uneven, urban “ecologies of learning”—magnet programmes, community arts, public lectures, internships—allow families to assemble a bespoke education. By contrast, in rural areas the friction costs of distance, limited transport, and thinner peer groups suppress participation; niche interests wither for lack of mentors, audiences, and competitions, curbing both ambition and feedback loops essential for excellence.

Second, while critics cite pollution, crime, and overstimulation, well-governed cities often produce healthier, more independent adolescents. Access to paediatric specialists, immunisation drives, speech therapists, and mental-health services is typically faster and broader; early intervention matters. Walkable streets, frequent public transport, and supervised community spaces teach time-management and situational awareness, the executive-function skills universities and employers implicitly reward. Urban parks, sports centres, swim clubs, and safe cycling corridors provide structured outlets that rival rural fields while adding coaching and competition. Countryside virtues—clean air, unstructured outdoor play, close-knit ties—are genuine, yet structural constraints remain: long travel for specialist care, narrower role models, patchy connectivity, and fewer cultural venues. Urban environmental downsides can be mitigated (green routes, HEPA filtration, school choice), whereas rural scarcities of expertise and opportunity are harder to redesign.

In sum, the city’s dense web of mentors, services, and public spaces equips children with broader competencies and choices. With prudent parenting and intelligent urban design, the benefits decisively outweigh the risks; growing up in a well-managed city is, on balance, the superior foundation for modern adulthood.

Achieve your dream score with our detailed IELTS eBooks - your complete guide!

Sample Essay 2

Whether the countryside or the city provides a better environment for children has long been debated. I firmly agree that rural life offers superior conditions for young people. Growing up in the countryside fosters physical and psychological well-being, while also nurturing deeper values of community and responsibility. These two factors demonstrate why a rural upbringing is more advantageous than an urban one.

One compelling reason the countryside is better for children is its health benefits and psychological stability. Rural environments typically provide cleaner air, lower noise levels, and safer outdoor spaces, which are vital for both physical growth and cognitive development. For instance, a child in a village may spend hours cycling on quiet roads, exploring forests, or tending gardens—activities that cultivate stamina and imagination simultaneously. In contrast, city children are often confined to polluted streets and indoor entertainment, with their recreational outlets limited by safety concerns. The constant rush, heavy traffic, and sensory overload of urban life can also elevate stress and impair concentration. By contrast, daily interaction with nature has been shown to reduce anxiety and enhance attention spans, making rural life more conducive to a child’s balanced growth.

Equally significant is the way countryside living instils values of community, responsibility, and patience in children. Unlike the often-anonymous relationships of big cities, rural societies function through close-knit ties where cooperation and trust are central. A child growing up in such an environment may help neighbours during harvests, care for animals, or share responsibilities within the household. These experiences foster empathy, accountability, and resilience—qualities essential for adulthood. City children, by comparison, are often overexposed to consumerist pressures, digital distractions, and competitive isolation, which may limit their capacity to build strong interpersonal bonds. The countryside, therefore, offers not only a healthier environment but also a moral and social foundation that cities struggle to replicate.

In conclusion, the countryside provides children with both physical advantages and moral enrichment. Cleaner surroundings and closer ties with nature ensure healthier growth, while community-driven lifestyles cultivate values that shape strong character. For these reasons, rural life clearly provides a more nurturing foundation for childhood than urban environments.

Achieve your dream score with our detailed IELTS eBooks - your complete guide!