top of page

Having a conversation on a mobile phone in a public or crowded place should be - Task 2 Essay Band 9

Updated: Mar 15

You should spend about 40 minutes on this task.


Write about the following topic:


Some people think that having a conversation on a mobile phone in a public or crowded place should be banned. Others feel that we should be able to talk wherever we like.

Discuss both these views and give your opinion.


Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge and experiences.


You should write at least 250 words.


Task 2 Sample Essay Band 9 - Some people think that having a conversation on a mobile phone in a public or crowded place should be banned. Others feel that we should be able to talk wherever we like.

Get your personalised IELTS Essay Feedback from a former examiner


Download IELTS eBooks, get everything you need to achieve a high band score



Model Essay 1

The ubiquity of mobile phones in public spaces has sparked a debate with strong arguments on both sides. Some advocate for restrictions on phone use in crowded areas to protect privacy and maintain tranquility, while others argue for the right to communicate freely, regardless of the setting. This essay will explore these viewpoints and propose a balanced solution that respects both individual freedoms and public decorum.


Those in favor of curbing mobile phone use in public areas argue from a standpoint of respect for communal space and the safeguarding of personal privacy. In crowded settings, such as trains or waiting rooms, the din of multiple conversations can be more than just an annoyance; it intrudes on the personal space of others, broadcasting private conversations to an unwilling audience. Moreover, the constant barrage of phone rings and alerts contributes to a cacophony that disturbs the peace. For instance, the introduction of quiet zones in libraries and some public transportation has been hailed as a success, suggesting that people value and benefit from such policies. Extending this argument, creating more spaces where silence is preserved could enhance the quality of our public environments, making them more enjoyable and less stressful for everyone.


On the other side of the debate, proponents of unrestricted mobile phone usage underscore the devices' role as vital tools for personal safety and connectivity. Phones are not just for casual chats; they are essential for emergency communications, accessing real-time information, and keeping in touch with family and work. In our fast-paced world, where timely communication can be crucial, limiting phone usage could hinder personal freedom and efficiency. The development of smart cities, which thrive on connectivity and the free flow of information, exemplifies how integral mobile communication is to modern urban living. Instead of restrictions, encouraging the use of earphones or promoting text-based communication in certain settings could mitigate disturbances without infringing on individual rights.


In conclusion, the necessity for both serenity and connectivity in public places is clear. A balanced solution providing designated areas for phone use and quiet zones would honor everyone's needs, ensuring public spaces are welcoming for all. This strategy harmonizes the dual values of quietude and connection, shaping a public realm that serves its diverse community effectively.


Download IELTS eBooks, get everything you need to achieve a high band score



Model Essay 2

In today's interconnected world, the debate over mobile phone usage in public spaces divides opinion. On one hand, some argue for a ban on such conversations in crowded areas, citing privacy and disturbance concerns. Conversely, others champion the freedom to communicate whenever necessary. This essay will explore both viewpoints before concluding in favor of a balanced approach.


Proponents of restricting mobile phone conversations in public venues often highlight the intrusion of privacy and the potential for creating noise pollution. Crowded places, by nature, encapsulate a melting pot of individuals, each with their own sensitivities and boundaries. An unregulated barrage of phone chats can lead to a cacophony of voices, disrupting the ambience and potentially sharing private matters inadvertently with strangers. For instance, a quiet carriage initiative on trains in several countries was met with widespread approval, underscoring the public's desire for quiet zones free from the intrusion of loud conversations.


On the flip side, advocates for the freedom to communicate argue that mobile phones are indispensable tools for modern living, providing safety, convenience, and the ability to stay connected with loved ones and professional contacts alike. In emergencies, the ability to make a call without restrictions can be lifesaving. Furthermore, the essence of public spaces is their openness and accessibility, principles that should extend to communication freedoms. Technological advancements, such as noise-cancelling headphones and silent zones, offer solutions that can mitigate disturbances without imposing outright bans.


In conclusion, while the call for restricting phone conversations in public areas stems from legitimate concerns over privacy and peace, an outright ban overlooks the critical role of communication in our lives. A middle ground, promoting the use of technology to minimize disturbances while preserving the freedom to communicate, seems to be the most pragmatic approach. Balancing these needs is essential in fostering a respectful and connected society.


Download IELTS eBooks, get everything you need to achieve a high band score



Sample Essay 3

Some would argue that the use of mobile phones to communicate should not be allowed in places where public gather, while others say that individuals should be able to talk over phone anywhere, they feel convenient. Although using phones amid public gatherings might reveal sensitive private information and expose the user to various dangers, I believe it should be allowed because the banning might come at the cost of some incredibly important calls.


When we talk over phone, we divert our maximum attention to the person who we talk to the other end, as a result, we could expose our confidential information that might make us vulnerable to various risks. In other words, during a conversation over mobile phone, we might be exchanging some very sensitive news which would definitely harm us if revealed to public. That means, some bad people might be present nearby and exploit them for the bad causes. Moreover, during a private conversation over phone, we tend to fall oblivious, which could give an advantage to the muggers or other criminals hovering around. For instance, according to The International Crime Watchdog, more than 80 percent petty crimes take place every year because of people’s absence of mind in public places. It reveals the extent of hazard that occurs due to the use of mobile phones in public places.


On the other hand, people should have the freedom to speak with their loved ones and others from any location they are present, because the emergency can arise at any time. Families are more concerned about their members when they are out, and as a result, they tend to call and enquire about their wellbeing. Therefore, people should be allowed to use their phones anywhere, regardless of public or private places. For instance, according to a survey conducted by the Guardian, 60% of the calls attended by individuals in common places are important calls that are too costly to ignore. Therefore, citizens should not be deprived of the right to attend phone calls in general places.


To conclude, while answering phone calls in common places can be a disturbance to others, I believe that communication is a necessity and therefore should never be banned.


Get your personalised IELTS Essay Feedback from a former examiner


Download IELTS eBooks, get everything you need to achieve a high band score

0 comments

Comments

Rated 0 out of 5 stars.
No ratings yet

Add a rating
bottom of page