top of page

Mothers Take Care of The Family and Should be Given Salaries by The Government - Task 2 Band 9 Essay

You should spend about 40 minutes on this task.


Write about the following topic:


Nowadays many mothers take care of the family and don't go out to work. Some people believe they should be given salaries by the government.

Do you agree or disagree?


Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge and experiences.


You should write at least 250 words.


Task 2 Band 9 Essay Sample Answer

Get your personalised IELTS Essay Feedback from a former examiner


Download IELTS eBooks, get everything you need to achieve a high band score



Model Essay 1

In contemporary society, the vital role of mothers in managing household affairs and nurturing families, without engaging in formal employment, has sparked debate regarding the appropriateness of financial compensation from governmental sources. I firmly believe in the merits of this proposition, primarily for its potential to acknowledge domestic contributions and enhance family welfare. The discourse will explore the intrinsic value of domestic work and its economic implications, alongside the positive repercussions on family dynamics and societal health.


Firstly, recognizing housework and childcare as economically valuable tasks effectively addresses the longstanding oversight of domestic contributions to societal welfare. The provision of a government salary for stay-at-home mothers not only validates their tireless endeavors but also equitably integrates them into the broader economic framework. This acknowledgment could catalyze a broader reevaluation of work and compensation, significantly underscoring the importance of non-market activities. Furthermore, this financial independence empowers women, fostering a profound sense of self-worth and autonomy, which, in turn, can lead to healthier, more equitable, and harmonious relationships within families.


Secondly, the strategic implementation of a governmental salary for mothers could substantially bolster family welfare and enhance societal health. With additional financial resources, families can afford better quality education, healthcare, and wider opportunities for their children, laying a solid foundation for a prosperous future generation. This thoughtful investment in the family unit contributes to a stronger, more resilient society, as children nurtured in secure, supportive, and enriching environments are likelier to grow into well-adjusted, contributing, and empathetic members of society.


In conclusion, compensating stay-at-home mothers through a government salary is a forward-thinking approach that acknowledges the substantial, albeit often overlooked, contribution of domestic management to societal prosperity. This policy not only reinforces the economic value of domestic labor but also promotes family well-being and societal health. By redefining the perception of work and value, we pave the way for a more inclusive, equitable, and flourishing society.


Download IELTS eBooks, get everything you need to achieve a high band score



Model Essay 2

The contemporary debate over whether stay-at-home mothers should receive a government salary illuminates a pivotal societal question. Advocating for this motion, I posit that such a policy would not only recognize the invaluable, often invisible labor that contributes to the fabric of society but also foster economic stability within families. This essay will delve into the economic validation of domestic work and its broader societal implications, followed by an examination of how such financial support can catalyze social equity and familial harmony.


The economic landscape of our society often undervalues activities that do not generate direct financial returns, notably domestic labor. By compensating stay-at-home mothers, we acknowledge the substantial economic value of their work, which, in essence, lays the groundwork for future generations. This form of recognition could lead to a seismic shift in how we value work, emphasizing the importance of contributions that sustain and enrich our lives beyond monetary metrics. Financial support for mothers at home would not only validate their contribution but also provide them with economic security, thereby enhancing their societal status and influence.


Moreover, the ripple effects of such a policy on social equity and family dynamics cannot be overstated. Financial compensation to mothers can lead to more balanced household power dynamics, enabling women to have a greater say in familial decisions. This shift could foster a more egalitarian society where duties and responsibilities, as well as privileges, are shared more equitably among genders. Furthermore, the financial relief provided could ease familial stress, leading to healthier home environments conducive to raising emotionally and intellectually nourished children.


In conclusion, offering a government salary to stay-at-home mothers is a profound step towards acknowledging the critical role they play in nurturing the future of society. It is a policy that recognizes the economic value of domestic labor, promotes gender equity, and underpins family well-being. Such a move would not only enrich our social fabric but also pave the way for a more inclusive and equitable future.


Download IELTS eBooks, get everything you need to achieve a high band score



Model Essay 3

Women often leave their career behind for raising their children and to take care of the elder members of the family. Some people argue that the government should financially assist them to make the society equal. I strongly disagree with this statement because it will shrink the overall economy by disincentivising working women.


To begin with, one drawback is the government subsidies that would increase the incentives for women to stay at home which in turn negatively impacts the labour markets. To be specific, mothers would drop out from jobs or be reluctant to re-enter workforce owning to the government financial aids to meet their daily costs. Take Taiwan parental social welfares as example, mothers while taking parental leaves could receive up to six months parental allowance based on 80% of the insured mothers’ average monthly insurance salaries. As per National Statistics in Taiwan, three quarters of new mothers opt to apply this policy and are absent from the job positions around six months. Thus, the compensations would dwindle the nation’s overall productivities.


Additionally, if the government decides to pay women who leave their jobs to care for their families a monthly payment, it will infuriate other women who work as professionals. If the women can make a living without working, then they will all give up their office jobs and become stay-at-home mothers. All women will eventually be compensated by the government for remaining at home, which will create a monumental pressure on public fund. Thus, paying moms who remain at home is bad for the economy as a whole.


To sum up, I am still of the opinion that it is not a wise policy to make payment to mothers from government agents, since it will demotivate women workforce significantly which has serious knock-on-effect on the national economic progress.



Sample Essay 4

At present, the high number of moms had resigned from their jobs after taking in charge of home duties. Some advocators state the government agents should provide financial supports for those out-of-office mothers. I totally agree with the concept since it is likely to enhance the birth rates and the quality of marriage.

To begin with, the financial aids from authorities are the most effective methods to boost the low birth rates, the biggest issues tackled by the developed countries. To be more specific, leaving the current jobs to take care of a new-born baby represents cutting down the part of the household income sources, resulting in significant impacts on the families with women who are the primary earners. However, the introduction of Paid Parental Leave schemes would help the families to service their daily expenses and increase their incentives to give birth a child. Thus, mothers with economic security can in turn increase their desires to have a baby.


Another supporting point is financial supports is a solid foundation for better quality of marriage. In other words, mothers with consistent disposable incomes from government sides will relieve the financial tension between the husband and wife. The negative feelings for sacrificing their careers with inequivalent payoffs will not fester in wives’ mind. In traditional Japanese cultures, women drop out the workforce and dive into the family with all-hearts. The whole family is going to depend on husband’s salary which is barely to cover family expenses. The financial burdens get on each other’s nerves. Therefore, the subsidies from public authorities are the useful tips for a happy marriage.


To sum up, I am still of the opinion that the direct compensation from government would increase the childbirth rate and cool stress between the couples.


Get your personalised IELTS Essay Feedback from a former examiner


Download IELTS eBooks, get everything you need to achieve a high band score

Comments


bottom of page