top of page

Many Museums Charge for Admission While Others Are Free - IELTS Task 2 Essay

Updated: Mar 17

You should spend about 40 minutes on this task.

Write about the following topic:

Many museums charge for admission while others are free.

Do you think the advantages of charging people for admission to museums outweigh the disadvantages?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge and experiences.

You should write at least 250 words.

Task 2 Band 9 Essay Sample (Many museums charge for admission while others are free.)

Get your personalised IELTS Essay Feedback from a former examiner

Download IELTS eBooks, get everything you need to achieve a high band score

Model Essay 1

The issue of whether museums should levy entrance fees is a contentious one, offering both merits and demerits. This essay posits that the advantages of charging admission overshadow the disadvantages, primarily through sustaining museum quality and facilitating educational outreach. These key points will be elaborated upon to underscore the rationale behind this stance.

Firstly, imposing entrance fees is crucial for the maintenance and enhancement of museum exhibits. Financial contributions from visitors not only enable the procurement of rare artifacts but also the employment of skilled professionals, ensuring a high-caliber visitor experience. For instance, the Louvre, by leveraging its admission fees, has managed to curate a collection that attracts millions, unequivocally demonstrating the direct correlation between revenue and the quality of the display. Furthermore, these funds are indispensable for the preservation of historical artifacts, ensuring they endure for future generations to appreciate and learn from. This financial model ensures museums remain temples of culture, meticulously safeguarded and continually enriched.

Secondly, the revenue generated from entrance fees underpins educational initiatives, allowing museums to extend their reach beyond their physical premises. This includes the development of interactive online resources, community outreach programs, and the provision of educational materials to schools, making culture and history accessible to those unable to visit in person. The British Museum's online archive serves as a stellar example, offering extensive access to its collections, significantly broadened by the financial support derived from ticket sales. Such initiatives demystify history and culture, fostering a more informed and engaged public. By bolstering these educational endeavors, museums not only preserve but also animate the narrative of human achievement for all.

In conclusion, while the debate over museum admission fees is multifaceted, the benefits of sustaining museum operations and expanding educational opportunities firmly tip the scales in favor of charging for entry. This approach not only ensures the preservation of cultural heritage but also democratizes access to knowledge, thus the advantages far outweigh the disadvantages.

Download IELTS eBooks, get everything you need to achieve a high band score

Model Essay 2

In the debate over whether museums should charge admission fees, the nuances of this discussion reveal profound implications for both the institutions and their patrons. This essay argues that the benefits of charging for museum entry significantly outweigh the potential drawbacks, with a focus on enhancing the quality of exhibits and supporting broader educational outreach. These focal points will be dissected to illustrate the multifaceted advantages of this approach.

Central to the argument for admission fees is their role in elevating the quality of museum exhibitions. By requiring a financial contribution from visitors, museums can allocate resources towards acquiring and conserving prestigious collections, as well as investing in advanced preservation technologies. Such measures not only safeguard the exhibits but also enrich the visitor's experience by offering a glimpse into less commonly seen wonders. The acquisition of a rare Van Gogh painting by the Metropolitan Museum of Art, funded by admission revenues, exemplifies how financial input directly translates to the enrichment of cultural offerings.

Moreover, admission charges are pivotal in extending the educational mandate of museums beyond their walls. Through the funds collected, institutions can craft innovative educational programs and digital platforms, thereby reaching a global audience. The development of virtual tours and online workshops, as made possible by the Smithsonian Institution, democratizes access to cultural education, allowing individuals from remote areas to engage with artifacts and narratives previously beyond their reach. This strategic use of revenues not only amplifies the educational impact of museums but also fosters a more inclusive cultural dialogue.

In summary, while the imposition of museum admission fees may be met with resistance, the resultant enhancement of exhibit quality and expansion of educational outreach justifies this practice. The strategic reinvestment of entry fees into both the physical and programmatic elements of museums ensures that these institutions can continue to fulfill their dual role as custodians of culture and educators, thereby the advantages far outweigh the disadvantages.

Download IELTS eBooks, get everything you need to achieve a high band score

Model Essay 3

The matter of whether museums should impose a fee for admission or be accessible to the public without charge is a subject of contention. While some argue that fees provide necessary funding to preserve and enhance exhibits, others hold the view that access to museums should be unrestricted, allowing everyone to experience the cultural and historical significance they offer. In this essay, we adopt the position that the drawbacks of charging admission to museums significantly surpass the benefits, thereby justifying free admission to this educational and cultural repository.

The argument that museums should be made accessible to all without charge is predicated on the belief that they serve as indispensable educational resources, particularly for children in their formative years. Providing young individuals with the opportunity to engage with tangible historical artifacts and relics, up close and personal, has the potential to foster and sustain their interest in history, art, and culture. Given that many children and young people often have limited financial resources, such as pocket money, it can be challenging for them to access museums that charge an entrance fee. As such, it is often suggested that museums, much like public libraries, should be made accessible to all, regardless of their means, and on any occasion, thereby enabling them to enrich their learning and broaden their horizons.

On the flip side, some argue that the management of museums is becoming increasingly reliant on visitor traffic. To begin with, museums require a substantial financial investment to maintain their operations, particularly for the preservation of exhibits that may be centuries or millennia old. Without the funds generated by admission fees, they are unable to sustain their activities. Furthermore, if they cannot rely on public admission fees, they may have to seek support from individual donors or philanthropic organizations, which could compromise the impartiality of exhibitions and potentially lead to external influence on administration, presentation, or even a complete overhaul of the museum's system.

In conclusion, though it is argued that admission fee is required to fund the conservation and the quality of exhibition, this essay takes the stance that access to museums should be unfettered because the disadvantages of charging admission to museums vastly outweigh the advantages.

Model Essay 4

Like any other out-of-classroom locations, museums provide educational opportunities for people to explore further about distinct subjects. However, some people argue that these museums should not collect entrance fees. Although imposing an entrance ticket might demotivate people to visit a museum, I believe that there are more benefits of it because the money collected can be used for the day-to-day operations of the museum.

The primary drawback of charging an admission fee is that it will hold back potential visitors from visiting these places with historical value. This is an extra cost on the people visiting, and they will think twice before deciding to visit these kinds of attractions. For instance, the National Museum of Sri Lanka attracted less than half of the crowed when the authority introduced an admission fee few years ago. Therefore, like public libraries, people’s demand for free access to museums on any occasions is justifiable.

However, there is an inevitable advantage of charging for museum admission, because this money plays critical roles in its management and quality assurance. The main advantage is that the entrance fee collected from its visitors will act as a great source of income for the museum. Places of this nature, which is expected to attract a huge number of visitors, incur a lot of operational expenses. So, if they charge a small amount when admitting visitors, it will aid them to cover their operating costs. To illustrate, the museums in Singapore cover almost all their running costs from admission charge income, leaving aside the government fund for the museum's development work to ensure better experience for the visitors. Therefore, imposing an entry fee in museums is logically a valid approach.

To conclude, although historical attractions have the risk of experiencing reduced number of people visiting, I strongly believe that the benefits of generating a museum's income through entry are far more impactful than the associated drawbacks.

Get your personalised IELTS Essay Feedback from a former examiner

Download IELTS eBooks, get everything you need to achieve a high band score



Obtuvo 0 de 5 estrellas.
Aún no hay calificaciones

Agrega una calificación
bottom of page