top of page

New Houses should be Built in the Same Style as Older Houses - IELTS Essay

Updated: Mar 30

Now Houses should be Built in the Same Style as Older Houses - IELTS Task 2 Band 9 Sample Essay

Get your personalised IELTS Essay Feedback from a former examiner

Download IELTS eBooks, get everything you need to achieve a high band score

Model Essay 1

The debate surrounding architectural conformity versus individual expression in housing design is multifaceted. On one hand, proponents argue for new houses to mirror the historic aesthetic of their locales, ensuring a cohesive visual tapestry. Conversely, others advocate for personal architectural freedom, allowing homeowners to reflect their unique preferences. This essay will explore both viewpoints, ultimately endorsing a balanced approach that harmonizes tradition with individuality.

Supporters of architectural uniformity posit that maintaining a consistent style preserves the historical character and cultural heritage of a region, imbuing neighborhoods with a timeless charm. This approach not only fosters a sense of community and belonging among residents but also enhances the aesthetic appeal of the area, potentially boosting tourism and instilling local pride. For instance, the quintessential terraced houses of Victorian London, with their distinctive brick facades and ornate detailing, serve as a testament to the city's rich historical narrative, contributing significantly to its unique identity and global appeal.

Contrarily, the freedom to design houses according to personal tastes is championed as a reflection of modern diversity and individualism, celebrating the myriad personal expressions and cultural influences present in contemporary society. This perspective argues that creativity and innovation should not be stifled by stringent regulations, as such restrictions limit the evolution of urban landscapes into vibrant, eclectic communities where diverse architectural styles coexist harmoniously. This environment of unrestricted creativity encourages architectural experimentation, leading to the development of sustainable, technologically advanced housing solutions. This is exemplified by the eco-friendly and futuristic designs seen in parts of Scandinavia, where innovative use of materials and energy-efficient designs set a benchmark for modern living spaces.

In conclusion, preserving historical aesthetics is crucial for cultural heritage, but it's equally vital to embrace the diversity and innovation that individual architectural freedom offers. A balanced approach, promoting stylistic diversity while respecting historical context, can create a vibrant urban landscape. This harmony between tradition and individuality enriches our communities in a comprehensive manner.

Download IELTS eBooks, get everything you need to achieve a high band score

Model Essay 2

The architectural landscape of communities often sparks debate: should new constructions pay homage to historical designs or embody the individuality of their owners? This essay argues for a harmonious integration of both, emphasizing the enrichment of cultural heritage alongside the celebration of contemporary diversity.

Adherents to traditional architectural styles firmly assert that such designs are not merely aesthetic choices but serve as the very backbone of a community's identity, acting as a tangible, enduring link to the past. These advocates vehemently highlight that consistent architectural themes do more than just preserve the essence of a region's history; they also instill a profound sense of continuity, belonging, and shared history among its inhabitants. The cobblestone streets and Tudor-style houses of Stratford-upon-Avon, for instance, not only encapsulate the town's rich Shakespearean heritage but also draw visitors from across the globe, fostering a deep-rooted pride and a sense of communal identity among locals.

Conversely, champions of architectural individualism passionately argue that personal expression in housing designs is a vivid reflection of the evolving nature of society, showcasing a diverse mosaic of cultural influences and personal aesthetics. This perspective steadfastly maintains that innovation in architecture should be unhindered by traditional constraints, propelling communities towards more sustainable, adaptable, and creatively inspired living environments. An illustration of this forward-thinking approach is the transformation of Rotterdam, where avant-garde designs harmoniously coexist with traditional Dutch architecture, illustrating a city that has been reborn from the ashes of war into a vibrant symbol of modern resilience, creativity, and architectural innovation.

In conclusion, preserving historical architecture and embracing modern design are both essential for reflecting our heritage and current societal values. A balanced approach that integrates these philosophies fosters a diverse, sustainable urban environment, honoring our past while embracing the future. This harmony enriches our cultural identity and supports a dynamic, inclusive community.

Download IELTS eBooks, get everything you need to achieve a high band score

Model Essay 3

The architectural debate between preserving traditional aesthetics versus championing architectural freedom captures a broader dialogue about our values and identity. This essay advocates for a nuanced understanding that appreciates the historical significance of architectural styles while also embracing the innovation and diversity of contemporary designs.

Historical architecture serves as a profound beacon of our past, firmly anchoring communities to their cultural and historical roots. Majestic gothic cathedrals scattered across Europe, with their soaring spires, intricate stonework, and stained glass masterpieces, are not simply buildings; they stand as storied monuments that eloquently narrate centuries of human endeavor, faith, artistic evolution, and resilience. These architectural wonders significantly foster a deep connection to our collective history, offering an irreplaceable sense of continuity, unity, and shared heritage that enriches our understanding of identity and belonging.

Yet, the realm of architecture must also reflect the dynamism of human creativity and the evolving nature of our societies. Architectural freedom allows for the expression of individuality, technological advancements, and the incorporation of sustainable practices. For instance, the burgeoning skyline of Dubai, characterized by its futuristic architecture, symbolizes not just wealth but a forward-looking optimism and a willingness to experiment with new forms and materials. This approach encourages diversity, adaptability, and innovation, essential qualities in a rapidly changing world.

In essence, the reconciliation of these perspectives lies in a balanced approach that honors our historical legacies while providing space for innovation and personal expression. Such a balance not only enriches the architectural landscape but also mirrors the complexity of human society, which is bound by tradition yet constantly moving towards the future.

To conclude, the debate over architectural styles transcends mere aesthetics, touching on deeper themes of identity, community, and progress. By valuing both our heritage and our capacity for innovation, we can create environments that are both meaningful and adaptable, embodying the richness of the human experience.

Get your personalised IELTS Essay Feedback from a former examiner

Download IELTS eBooks, get everything you need to achieve a high band score



Rated 0 out of 5 stars.
No ratings yet

Add a rating
bottom of page