top of page

Proportion of Different Categories of Families Living in Poverty in Australia

You should spend about 20 minutes on this task.


The table below shows the proportion of different categories of families living in poverty in Australia in 1999.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 


Write at least 150 words.

Proportion of Different Categories of Families Living in Poverty in Australia

Get your personalised IELTS Essay Feedback from a former examiner


Download IELTS eBooks, get everything you need to achieve a high band score



Model Answer 1

The table delineates the percentages and corresponding headcounts of varied family constructs grappling with economic hardship within Australia during the year 1999.


An overarching observation of the data reveals that a substantial segment of Australian families, exceeding 1.83 million, were ensnared in the throes of impoverishment, with particular family types being more susceptible than others. Notably, families without the buffer of children, whether single or aged couples, exhibited relative financial resilience compared to those with dependent offspring.


Delving into the specifics, the demographic of sole parents emerged as the most afflicted, with 21% (232,000 individuals) living in poverty. Similarly, single individuals devoid of offspring represented a significant portion of this socio-economic challenge, with 19% (359,000 individuals) facing penury. Moreover, families comprising both parents and children constituted 12% (933,000 individuals) of the poverty-stricken populace, marking them as the family type with the highest absolute number languishing in poverty.


Conversely, the data illustrates a contrasting financial stability among aged couples and single aged persons, who are reported at 4% (48,000 individuals) and 6% (54,000 individuals) respectively. In an interesting comparison within dual-adult households, those devoid of children portrayed a better economic stance, at 7% (211,000 individuals), as opposed to their child-rearing counterparts.


Download IELTS eBooks, get everything you need to achieve a high band score



Model Answer 2

The provided table delineates the different categories of families living in poverty in Australia for the year 1999, detailing both percentages and absolute figures.


A cursory examination reveals that a significant section, over one in ten households, found themselves grappling with poverty. Predominantly affected were families with children and single individuals without offspring.


Delving into specifics, elderly Australians appeared to be the least impacted, with only 6% of single aged persons and a mere 4% of aged couples experiencing economic hardship. In stark contrast, the data illustrates that 19% of single individuals with no children, totaling upwards of 359,000, were not as financially secure. Couples without children were better off, with only 7% living in penury.


However, the plight of sole parents was particularly acute, as they constituted the highest proportion of poverty at 21%, amounting to 232,000 individuals. Conclusively, families consisting of couples with children represented the largest numerical group living in destitution, with 933,000 such households, or 12%, falling below the poverty line.


Download IELTS eBooks, get everything you need to achieve a high band score



Model Answer 3

The provided table delineates the percentages and absolute figures pertaining to various family constructs subsisting in indigence within Australia for the year 1999.


An overview of the data indicates that poverty afflicted over 1.8 million households, encapsulating roughly 11% of all familial units in Australia. Notably, single, no children households, and sole parents represented the categories most burdened by impoverishment.


Delving into specifics, sole parents emerged as the group most disproportionately impacted, with 21% living in poverty, translating to 232,000 households. Conversely, aged couples were the least affected, with only 4% or 48,000 households experiencing financial hardship. Singles without children also faced significant challenges, with 19% or 359,000 households in poverty. Meanwhile, couples with children constituted the largest number in absolute terms, with 933,000 households, or 12%, living below the poverty line.


Moreover, the data showcases that single aged persons and couples without children experienced poverty at rates of 6% (54,000 households) and 7% (211,000 households) respectively.


Download IELTS eBooks, get everything you need to achieve a high band score



Model Answer 4

The provided table delineates the proportions of different categories of families living in poverty within Australia during the year 1999.


An overarching review of the data indicates that one in ten Australian households encountered financial hardship, with sole parents and childless singles being particularly susceptible to impoverished conditions.


Delving into the specifics, sole parents represented the highest percentage within their group at 21%, which translates to 232,000 households grappling with poverty. This was closely followed by singles without children, who accounted for 19% or 359,000 of their category. These figures starkly contrast with the relatively lower percentages of impoverished aged couples and couples without children, at a mere 4% and 7% respectively.


Moreover, while couples with children constituted 12% of their category living in poverty, they represented the most substantial number in terms of absolute figures, amounting to 933,000 households. This juxtaposition between percentages and actual numbers highlights the nuanced nature of economic hardship across different family types.


Get your personalised IELTS Essay Feedback from a former examiner


Download IELTS eBooks, get everything you need to achieve a high band score

Comments


bottom of page