top of page

It is Good to Share as much Information as Possible in Scientific Research - Task 2 Band 9 Essay

You should spend about 40 minutes on this task.


Write about the following topic:


Some people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible in scientific research, business and the academic world. Others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely.

Discuss both these views and give your opinion.


Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge and experiences.


You should write at least 250 words.


Task 2 Band 9 Essay Sample - Some people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible in scientific research, business and the academic world. Others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely.

Get your personalised IELTS Essay Feedback from a former examiner


Download IELTS eBooks, get everything you need to achieve a high band score



Model Essay 1

In the realms of scientific research, business, and academia, the debate on whether to disseminate information freely or to safeguard certain knowledge due to its significance and value is ongoing. Advocates for open sharing emphasize the acceleration of innovation and collective problem-solving, while opponents argue for the protection of intellectual property and competitive advantage. This essay will explore both perspectives and argue in favor of a balanced approach that prioritizes strategic sharing while protecting essential information.


The argument for unrestricted information sharing rests on the foundation of collective progress. In scientific research, the free exchange of findings can lead to rapid advancements in technology and medicine, as researchers build upon each other's work. For instance, the global scientific community's collaborative effort in sharing research on COVID-19 has undoubtedly accelerated vaccine development. Similarly, in the business and academic worlds, open access to information encourages innovation, as it allows for the cross-pollination of ideas, fostering creativity and problem-solving.


Conversely, the stance on withholding certain information stems from the need to preserve intellectual property and maintain a competitive edge. In business, proprietary knowledge is a company's lifeblood, offering a unique value proposition that distinguishes it from competitors. For academics, the fruits of painstaking research can lead to patents or publishing deals that might be compromised by premature disclosure. Thus, protecting information is deemed essential for sustaining individual and organizational achievements and for incentivizing further innovation.


Balancing these perspectives, it becomes apparent that while openness fosters collective advancement, the protection of key information is crucial for personal and organizational prosperity. A pragmatic approach would advocate for the strategic sharing of information, where collaboration is encouraged but critical intellectual property is safeguarded to maintain competitiveness and incentivize innovation.


In conclusion, the discourse between unrestricted information sharing and the protection of valuable knowledge presents valid arguments on both sides. A balanced approach, advocating for strategic sharing while protecting essential data, appears to be the most viable path forward. This methodology ensures the collective benefit of shared knowledge and the preservation of competitive advantages, steering both individual and communal progress.


Download IELTS eBooks, get everything you need to achieve a high band score



Model Essay 2

The dissemination of information in scientific, business, and academic sectors is a topic of considerable debate, with opinions divided between the merits of open sharing and the necessity of guarding sensitive data. This essay posits that while sharing information can significantly enhance collective knowledge and innovation, the protection of proprietary information is essential for sustaining economic competitiveness and intellectual property rights.


Open sharing of information, especially in scientific research, has the potential to accelerate discoveries and technological advancements. An illustrative example is the Human Genome Project, where scientists worldwide shared their findings, leading to groundbreaking advancements in genetics and biotechnology. This collaborative spirit epitomizes how shared knowledge can solve complex problems more efficiently than siloed efforts. In academia, open access to research findings enhances educational quality by broadening the knowledge base available to students and researchers alike.


However, the argument for restricting information flow primarily revolves around the protection of intellectual property and maintaining a competitive edge in business. For instance, tech companies like Apple and Google invest heavily in research and development, with the understanding that their innovations, if prematurely disclosed, could be capitalized upon by competitors, undermining their market position and profitability. Thus, while the ethos of sharing is commendable, it is pragmatically untenable in contexts where intellectual property rights and market competitiveness are at stake.


Balancing these viewpoints, it becomes clear that a nuanced approach is warranted. While advocating for the unrestricted sharing of information in academic and certain research contexts can foster innovation and societal progress, in business, a more guarded strategy is necessary to protect intellectual property and ensure competitive advantage.


In conclusion, while the open dissemination of information has undeniable benefits for society, especially in advancing knowledge and innovation, the protection of sensitive information is paramount in business contexts to safeguard intellectual property and maintain market competitiveness. A judicious balance between these two approaches, tailored to the context, is essential for maximizing the benefits of information sharing while minimizing its risks.

Download IELTS eBooks, get everything you need to achieve a high band score



Model Essay 3

Some individuals think it is beneficial to disclose as much knowledge as you can in the fields of business, academia, and scientific study. Others think that certain information is too valuable or crucial to be disclosed without compensation. Both sides have their views, and I personally think that if all information were made available to them, scientific research, the academic community, and corporations would all substantially benefit.


Prior to being made public, sensitive materials ought to be carefully reviewed. This includes information that may compromise national security, cause a public uproar, provide terrorists access to technology, or help corporations monopolize certain markets. Information spreads quickly in this digital age, and many believe that in order to preserve world peace, it should be regulated. For instance, if nuclear technology is made available to all countries for scientific research, the globe would soon be on the edge of extinction despite the improbable potential that this technology has to benefit the populace.


Scientific research, on the other hand, mainly depends on data that is already available from earlier discoveries. If pertinent information and prior findings are not publicly shared among academics and researchers, global advancement would stop. For instance, even though the Internet is perhaps the most significant invention the modern world has ever generated, without the US military's sharing of this technology, we would still be living in the pre-internet era. Additionally, suppressing them is the same as eradicating the chance for progress since hidden knowledge is meaningless if it is not used in the real world. The human species has advanced due to discoveries and innovations that have been shared with the world because each one has undergone substantial modification and refinement, according to global history.


In conclusion, knowledge that is held in reserve and not discussed by great minds is of little worth. In order to properly develop mankind, restrictions on critical knowledge should be abolished, and the people should be informed the truth.


Get your personalised IELTS Essay Feedback from a former examiner


Download IELTS eBooks, get everything you need to achieve a high band score

Comments


bottom of page