Some People Believe That They Should Not Pay Tax to The State - IELTS Task 2 Band 9 Sample Essays

Achieve your dream score with our detailed IELTS eBooks - your complete guide!

Model Essay 1

The notion that individuals should retain all their earnings and be exempt from taxation has gained traction in some circles, particularly among advocates of economic libertarianism. However, I strongly disagree with this view. Taxes are indispensable for sustaining public infrastructure and ensuring social equity. This essay will argue that taxation underpins essential services and mitigates socio-economic disparities, both of which are fundamental to a stable and functional society.

First and foremost, taxation is the financial backbone of public goods and services that individuals cannot efficiently provide for themselves. Governments rely on tax revenues to fund critical sectors such as healthcare, education, transportation, and national defense. For instance, without taxation, it would be implausible to maintain large-scale infrastructure like highways or public hospitals, which require substantial and continuous investment. Moreover, these services benefit all citizens, including those who may not directly contribute proportionately, thereby fostering collective welfare. If individuals were allowed to withhold taxes entirely, the result would likely be a deterioration of public systems, leading to inefficiencies, reduced quality of life, and ultimately, economic stagnation.

Equally important is the role of taxation in promoting social justice and reducing inequality. In most modern economies, progressive tax systems are designed so that higher earners contribute a larger share, thereby enabling wealth redistribution. This redistribution funds social safety nets such as unemployment benefits, pensions, and subsidies for the underprivileged. Without such mechanisms, income inequality would widen significantly, potentially leading to social unrest and diminished social cohesion. For example, Scandinavian countries, which maintain relatively high tax rates, consistently rank among the most equitable and livable societies in the world. This demonstrates that taxation, when administered effectively, can enhance both fairness and societal well-being.

In conclusion, the idea of abolishing taxes is both impractical and detrimental. Taxation is crucial not only for maintaining essential public services but also for ensuring a more equitable distribution of wealth. Therefore, rather than rejecting taxes outright, efforts should focus on improving their transparency and efficiency, reinforcing their vital role in modern society.

Achieve your dream score with our detailed IELTS eBooks - your complete guide!

Model Essay 2

The proposition that individuals should retain the entirety of their earnings and be absolved from paying taxes to the state has become increasingly prominent in debates about economic autonomy. I unequivocally agree with this stance. Compulsory taxation often represents an inefficient appropriation of personal income and undermines individual liberty. This essay will argue that private allocation of resources is typically more efficient than state spending, and that voluntary systems can replace coercive taxation while preserving essential services.

The primary justification for allowing individuals to keep their full income lies in the superior efficiency of private financial decision-making compared to government expenditure. Individuals, driven by self-interest and immediate needs, tend to allocate resources more judiciously than bureaucratic institutions, which are frequently plagued by administrative waste, mismanagement, and political opportunism. For example, large-scale public projects often suffer from cost overruns and limited accountability, whereas private enterprises operate under competitive pressures that incentivise efficiency and innovation. If individuals were permitted to retain their earnings, they could invest in education, healthcare, or entrepreneurship according to their priorities, thereby fostering a more dynamic and responsive economy. In this sense, taxation can be seen as a distortionary mechanism that reallocates capital away from its most productive uses.

Equally compelling is the argument that essential public services can be sustained through voluntary contributions and market-based mechanisms rather than coercive taxation. Historically, many services such as education, infrastructure, and even social welfare have been supported through philanthropic initiatives, community funding, and private-sector solutions. For instance, charitable organisations and non-governmental institutions often deliver aid more efficiently and with greater transparency than state agencies. Moreover, subscription-based models, user fees, and public-private partnerships can ensure that services are both accessible and accountable. By removing the obligation to pay taxes, individuals are empowered to support causes they genuinely value, thereby creating a system rooted in consent rather than compulsion. This not only enhances personal freedom but also encourages civic responsibility through voluntary engagement.

In conclusion, permitting individuals to retain all their earnings is both economically rational and ethically defensible. Private allocation of resources minimises inefficiency, while voluntary and market-driven systems can effectively replace state-funded services. Therefore, eliminating compulsory taxation would promote both individual autonomy and a more efficient distribution of wealth.