top of page

Traffic and housing problems could be solved by moving large companies, factories....(Band 9 Essay)

You should spend about 40 minutes on this task.


Write about the following topic:


Traffic and housing problems could be solved by moving large companies, factories, and their employees to the countryside.

Do you agree or disagree?


Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge and experiences.


You should write at least 250 words.


Task 2 Band 9 Essay Sample (Traffic and housing problems could be solved by moving large companies, factories, and their employees to the countryside.)

Get your personalised IELTS Essay Feedback from a former examiner


Download IELTS eBooks, get everything you need to achieve a high band score



Sample Essay 1

A proposition has been put forth suggesting that the predicaments of traffic and housing shortages could be ameliorated through the relocation of significant corporate entities, manufacturing plants, and their respective workforce to rural territories. I strongly concur with this notion, as it promises to alleviate the congestion of urban centres, stemming from the reduced number of commuters on the roads, and an augmented inventory of residential accommodations.


To commence, routing employees to rural areas would alleviate traffic congestion by curtailing the number of daily commuters using various modes of transportation. The concentration of a significant workforce within city limits serves as a principal factor leading to traffic congestion. Therefore, directing employees to countryside locales would relieve the metropolis of this problem. For instance, London experiences peak-hour traffic during morning and evening rush hours, primarily due to employees commuting to and from their workplaces. Moreover, relocating to the countryside would provide city migrants with a chance to improve their quality of life by enjoying spacious living quarters and fresh air, a luxury that is often unattainable for city dwellers.


When it comes to housing, the issue of availability is often exacerbated by the high demand for rental properties, which is largely driven by the employees of significant corporations and manufacturing facilities. When these employees are relocated to rural areas, the demand for housing in urban centres decreases, resulting in a surplus of available flats. Thus, as more companies and their workforce are encouraged to relocate to the countryside, it can alleviate the housing crisis in cities by creating more housing opportunities for those in need. Milan, a city in Italy, serves as an example of how relocating companies and their employees to rural areas can mitigate housing shortages in urban centres. Milan encouraged companies to relocate their operations to the rural parts of the region, thereby freeing up more housing for residents in need.


To conclude, transferring businesses and their workforce out of the city is a plausible strategy to mitigate traffic and housing challenges, as it would decentralize industrial operations and distribute the burden between the city and countryside.


Download IELTS eBooks, get everything you need to achieve a high band score



Sample Essay 2

The notion that traffic and housing issues could be significantly alleviated by relocating large enterprises, their manufacturing counterparts, and personnel to rural locales has garnered attention. This essay posits that while this approach holds merit in addressing urban congestion and accommodation crises, it also entails nuanced considerations. The ensuing discussion will delve into the potential benefits and accompanying challenges of such a strategy.


Central to the argument for decentralization is the alleviation of urban strain. Moving large companies to the countryside promises to reduce vehicular congestion and demand for housing in metropolitan areas, thereby mitigating two of the most pressing urban dilemmas. For instance, a company's relocation can lead to a more even distribution of population and economic activity, which, in turn, diminishes the intensity of urban traffic and lowers housing demand, potentially stabilizing real estate prices. Moreover, this dispersal of economic opportunities could stimulate rural development, reducing the urban-rural divide and promoting more balanced regional growth.


However, the implementation of this proposal is not devoid of hurdles. The infrastructure in many rural areas may be insufficient to support large businesses and their employees, necessitating significant investment in transport, utilities, and housing. Additionally, the transition could disrupt the lives of employees, many of whom may be unwilling or unable to relocate due to personal ties or the allure of urban amenities. Hence, while the idea of moving large companies to the countryside is appealing for its potential to solve traffic and housing problems, it requires a comprehensive strategy that addresses the logistical and human elements involved.


In conclusion, the proposition that relocating large companies and their workforces to rural areas can address traffic and housing challenges presents a compelling, albeit complex, solution. It offers a pathway to more sustainable urban living and the revitalization of rural communities. However, the success of such a move hinges on careful planning and the commitment to overcoming the substantial logistical and socio-economic barriers that accompany it.


Download IELTS eBooks, get everything you need to achieve a high band score



Sample Essay 3

Opinions are often divergent regarding whether large-scale companies should relocate their facilities and employees to rural areas to mitigate inner-city traffic and accommodation problems. Despite a reduction in the volume of traffic and housing demands in big cities, this would not be an optimal solution to tackle the issues.


Relocating large businesses to the outskirts derives a major benefit involving diminishing the number of city occupants required to migrate for work. The decline in the cities’ population often translates to a decrease in traffic during rush hours with fewer private vehicles used to commute to work. A shrink in the inner-city population might also ameliorate the dwelling demands in the city centres, relieving the pressure on the state housing supply systems.


The idea that relocating big companies and factories to the countryside would solve traffic and housing problems is flawed. While this solution might bring some benefits, such as creating job opportunities and boosting the rural economy, it fails to address the root causes of the urban housing and traffic issues. These problems stem from a combination of factors, including ineffective traffic laws, poor public awareness, and inadequate urban infrastructure. Similarly, housing scarcity in cities is driven by a desire for increased living space and amenities, not just the presence of large firms and factories. Therefore, moving large companies and factories to the countryside is unlikely to provide a comprehensive solution to the housing and traffic problems in urban areas.


In conclusion, the positives of businesses being relocated to the rural areas are affirmed; however, it is not the most effective approach to solve the difficulties concerning accommodation and traffic in the big cities.


Get your personalised IELTS Essay Feedback from a former examiner


Download IELTS eBooks, get everything you need to achieve a high band score

Comments


bottom of page