Wealthy Nations Should Assist Poorer Countries with Humanitarian Relief During Natural Disasters - IELTS Essay

Get your personalised IELTS Essay Feedback from a former examiner

Download IELTS eBooks, get everything you need to achieve a high band score

Model Essay 1

The imperative for affluent nations to extend humanitarian aid to their less fortunate counterparts in the wake of natural calamities is a topic of considerable ethical import. I firmly believe in the obligation of wealthier countries to offer such support, predicated on principles of global solidarity and the tangible benefits of fostering stability and resilience. This essay will elucidate the moral imperative and the pragmatic advantages of this stance.

Firstly, the moral argument for assistance is grounded in the concept of global citizenship, where humanity's collective welfare transcends national borders. Wealthy nations, equipped with ample resources, have a duty to mitigate the suffering caused by natural disasters in poorer countries. This not only exemplifies compassion and empathy but also reinforces a sense of global unity. For instance, the international response to the 2004 Indian Ocean tsunami showcased how concerted relief efforts can alleviate human suffering significantly, underlining the potential of international solidarity in times of crisis.

Moreover, from a pragmatic perspective, aiding countries in distress fosters global stability and economic development. Disasters can exacerbate underlying vulnerabilities, leading to socio-economic downturns that affect global markets. By assisting in the immediate aftermath and contributing to rebuilding efforts, wealthier nations can help ensure that affected countries rebound more swiftly, thus stabilizing regional economies and by extension, the global economic landscape. The rebuilding of Haiti post the 2010 earthquake, heavily supported by international aid, illustrates how such endeavors contribute to the stabilization of affected nations, indirectly benefiting donor countries through enhanced global economic stability and security.

In conclusion, the rationale for wealthier nations to assist poorer ones during natural disasters is twofold: it is a moral imperative rooted in a sense of global community and a practical strategy for promoting worldwide stability and prosperity. This dual perspective not only highlights the inherent duty of wealthier nations but also underscores the mutual benefits derived from such humanitarian acts.

Download IELTS eBooks, get everything you need to achieve a high band score

Model Essay 2

The proposition that wealthy nations should provide humanitarian aid to poorer countries during natural disasters is not merely an act of charity, but a cornerstone of international responsibility and mutual benefit. This essay advocates strongly for such assistance, emphasizing the dual rationale of ethical duty and strategic self-interest for affluent countries. The forthcoming discussion will delve into these facets, illustrating the imperative for and advantages of global solidarity in disaster response.

The ethical dimension of this debate hinges on the principle of shared humanity. Prosperous nations, by virtue of their resources and technological advancements, hold a unique position to alleviate the human cost of natural catastrophes in less affluent regions. This responsibility stems not from benevolence but from an acknowledgment of a shared destiny. The aid rendered to Nepal during the 2015 earthquake by countries far and wide serves as a poignant example of how the international community can mobilize to support recovery, underscoring the premise that compassion knows no borders.

Strategically, the extension of aid is a sound investment in global stability and security. Disasters do not respect national boundaries, and their aftermath can precipitate regional conflicts, migration crises, and economic downturns that have far-reaching implications. By intervening promptly and effectively, wealthy countries can help mitigate these risks, ensuring a quicker path to recovery and stability. The support given to Indonesia following the 2018 tsunami by international partners not only facilitated immediate relief but also helped prevent a longer-term humanitarian and economic crisis, showcasing the interconnected nature of our global system.

In summary, the argument for affluent nations aiding poorer counterparts in the aftermath of natural disasters is compelling both on moral grounds and as a matter of enlightened self-interest. It embodies a recognition of our collective humanity and the interlinked fate that binds us across geographical and economic divides.

Get your personalised IELTS Essay Feedback from a former examiner

Download IELTS eBooks, get everything you need to achieve a high band score