top of page

Many People Think that Zoos Are Cruel. Others Think They Are Protecting Rare Animals - Task 2 Essay

Updated: Aug 29, 2023

You should spend about 40 minutes on this task.


Write about the following topic:


Many people think that zoos are cruel. Others think they are helpful in protecting rare animals.

Discuss both sides and give your own opinion.


Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge and experiences.


You should write at least 250 words.


Get your Detailed Essay Feedback from an IELTS Examiner


IELTS Task 2 Essay Band 9 Sample - Many people think that zoos are cruel. Others think they are helpful in protecting rare animals. Discuss both sides and give your own opinion.

Get our downloadable eBooks, learn the details how to write a high band essay



IELTS Task 2 Band 9 Sample Essay

The debate over the effectiveness and morality of zoos in protecting and conserving rare animals has been a contentious topic for many years. This essay will examine both sides of the debate before arguing that the practice of removing animals from their natural habitats and subjecting them to inadequate care and support in zoos is, in fact, inhumane.


Advocates of zoos argue that the alarming rise in the number of critically endangered species, such as elephants and rhinos slaughtered for commercial purposes, highlights the need for environmentalists and wildlife conservationists to support the establishment of zoological gardens. These facilities often have access to advanced veterinary care and employ trained professionals who can provide medical care and rehabilitation for sick or injured animals. For rare species, where each animal's existence is crucial to the species' overall survival, this can be particularly important. For example, statistics reveal that only a few Bengal tigers and African pangolins remain in wildlife parks due to heavy poaching in their natural habitats.


However, critics of menageries argue that capturing and transporting animals from their natural habitats to zoos is inherently cruel. They contend that many animals have intricate social structures and rely on their families and communities for survival. The process of capturing and removing them from the wild can cause immense stress and trauma, both for the individual animal and for their social group as a whole. This can lead to a range of negative consequences, such as disrupted social hierarchies, increased aggression, and decreased reproduction rates. Moreover, transporting animals to enclosures typically involves placing them in entirely unfamiliar environments with different climates, landscapes, and food sources, causing further stress and disorientation as they try to adapt to a new way of life.


In conclusion, while some argue that zoos can play an important role in protecting endangered species, the complex social structures of many animals, combined with the trauma of capture and transport, can have significant negative effects on their wellbeing.


Get our downloadable eBooks, learn the details how to write a high band essay



IELTS Task 2 Band 8 Sample Essay

In contemporary times, there has been an upsurge in the popularity of wildlife parks and zoos, which has led to a polarized debate regarding the morality of capturing species in such enclosures. While some argue that it is an effective approach to safeguard endangered creatures, others believe it to be inhumane. This essay seeks to explore both sides of the debate before outlining why I believe that the cruel and traumatic experiences that zoo animals endure, resulting from the facilities' failure to provide basic standards of care, is significant and amounts to animal cruelty.


Those in favour of zoos' existence argue that the alarming growth of critically endangered animals such as elephants and rhinos, which are slaughtered for commercial value, requires the support of wildlife conservationists and environmentalists in establishing zoos or national parks. For centuries, these menageries have provided a safe haven for rare species, saving hundreds of thousands of obscure animals from wildlife crimes. For instance, statistics indicate that only a few Bengal tigers and African pangolins remain in wildlife parks due to rampant poaching in their natural habitats.


On the other hand, critics of zoos aiding conservation argue that these premises have failed to meet all the unique environmental, nutritional, climate, and social needs of the creatures they hold captive. The facilities' limited financial resources, which often depend on revenue generated from visitors and stakeholders, may hamper the distribution of funds for animal care and nutrition. Consequently, the animals suffer from malnourishment, hypothermia, lack of veterinary care, and outright neglect. According to a research study conducted in Vietnam, more than half of Vietnamese zoos did not meet the minimum animal welfare standards.


In conclusion, despite the argument that zoos assist in wildlife preservation by providing a secure living environment, I maintain that the traumatizing experience of kidnapped and captive species in an inadequate living standard is more devastating. It is, therefore, essential for authorities to propose policies and enforce laws to eliminate inhumane actions towards animals and ensure that zoos meet the minimum standards of care required to guarantee the animals' well-being.


Get your Detailed Essay Feedback from an IELTS Examiner


Get our downloadable eBooks, learn the details how to write a high band essay

bottom of page