Get your personalised IELTS Essay Feedback from a former examiner
Download IELTS eBooks, get everything you need to achieve a high band score
Sample Essay 1
While some advocate for banning smoking in public places as an adequate deterrent, others contend that additional interventions are essential. This essay will examine the impact of public smoking bans on reducing visibility and social acceptability, as well as the effectiveness of broader strategies like educational campaigns and higher taxation. I will argue that a multifaceted approach is crucial for effectively curbing smoking behaviour.
Proponents of banning smoking in public areas assert that such measures are not only essential for public health but also act as a significant deterrent. The visibility of smoking is reduced, and the social acceptability of the habit is diminished. For instance, cities like New York and London, which have enforced strict bans on public smoking, report significant decreases in smoking rates. These bans also protect non-smokers from second-hand smoke, contributing to a healthier public environment. The convenience of smoking is reduced, making it less appealing, especially to casual or social smokers who might find it easier to quit.
However, critics of this approach argue that bans alone are insufficient. They suggest that without addressing the root causes of smoking, such as stress, addiction, and social influences, smoking will persist in non-public spaces, merely shifting the problem. Comprehensive measures are needed, including robust smoking cessation programs, higher taxes on tobacco products, and aggressive public health campaigns that target both youths and adults. For example, Australia’s combination of high cigarette taxes, plain packaging laws, and extensive public education campaigns has led to one of the lowest smoking rates globally. Such measures tackle both the demand for and the supply of tobacco, making it less accessible and less desirable.
In conclusion, while banning smoking in public places is a critical step towards a smoke-free society, it should be part of a broader strategy that includes educational and preventive measures. By combining legislative actions with supportive programs that address the psychological and social dimensions of smoking, societies can more effectively reduce smoking rates and improve public health.
Download IELTS eBooks, get everything you need to achieve a high band score
Sample Essay 2
The debate over effective measures to curb smoking often centres on whether banning it in public spaces suffices or if more comprehensive actions are necessary. Proponents of public bans argue that they serve as a direct deterrent, making smoking less visible and socially acceptable. Conversely, others advocate for a multifaceted approach, involving education, stricter regulations on tobacco sales, and support for cessation programs. This essay will explore both perspectives and argue in favour of the latter for a more profound impact on public health.
Banning smoking in public places is viewed by many as a crucial measure in decreasing its prevalence. Such bans not only protect non-smokers from harmful second-hand smoke but also alter social norms, making smoking less acceptable and visible, thereby reducing its appeal to new smokers, especially younger populations. For instance, countries like Australia and Ireland have observed substantial reductions in smoking rates after enforcing strict public smoking laws. These legal measures contribute to a broader societal transformation towards health-conscious behaviours, amplifying public awareness about the negative health impacts of smoking and endorsing a healthier, smoke-free lifestyle. This shift is instrumental in catalysing further public and legislative support for anti-smoking initiatives, strengthening the overall impact of such policies on community health.
However, the effectiveness of public smoking bans alone is limited. Smoking is not just a habit but a complex addiction influenced by behavioural, psychological, and social factors. Spatial restrictions alone cannot address the root causes of smoking. A comprehensive strategy is necessary, one that includes educational campaigns to inform the public about the dangers of smoking and provides support through affordable cessation aids like nicotine patches or counselling. Additionally, stringent regulations on tobacco advertising and sales reduce its visibility and attractiveness. For instance, New Zealand's strategy of combining high taxes on tobacco with vigorous public health campaigns has proven to be highly effective in reducing smoking rates, showing the importance of a multifaceted approach in public health initiatives.
In conclusion, while banning smoking in public places is a critical and effective measure, it must be part of a broader, multi-pronged strategy to tackle the smoking epidemic more effectively. By combining public bans with educational efforts, support for cessation, and strict regulatory policies, society can combat not only the act of smoking but also the underlying issues that fuel it.
Get your personalised IELTS Essay Feedback from a former examiner
Download IELTS eBooks, get everything you need to achieve a high band score