top of page

Different Methods of Waste Disposal in Four Cities: Toronto, Madrid, Kuala Lumpur and Amman

You should spend about 20 minutes on this task.


The bar chart shows different methods of waste disposal in four cities: Toronto, Madrid, Kuala Lumpur and Amman.


Summarize the information by describing the main features of the chart and making comparisons where appropriate.


Write at least 150 words.

Different Methods of Waste Disposal in Four Cities: Toronto, Madrid, Kuala Lumpur and Amman

Get your personalised IELTS Essay Feedback from a former examiner


Download IELTS eBooks, get everything you need to achieve a high band score



Model Answer 1

The bar chart delineates the utilization of various methods of waste disposal in four cities: Toronto, Madrid, Kuala Lumpur, and Amman.


An overview of the data highlights that landfill is the predominant method of waste disposal in Toronto and a significant practice in Amman, while Kuala Lumpur favors incineration. Madrid's waste disposal is more evenly distributed among landfill, incineration, and recycling, whereas composting remains the least employed method across all cities.


Delving into specifics, Toronto’s reliance on landfill is markedly evident, with over 70% of its waste processed this way. Amman also leans on this method, albeit to a lesser degree, at nearly 50%. In contrast, Madrid and Kuala Lumpur allocate 29% and 15% to landfilling, respectively. Incineration is Kuala Lumpur’s chief strategy, handling over half of its waste. Madrid and Amman follow, utilizing incineration for 40% and 38% of waste disposal. Toronto exhibits a minimal use of incineration.


Recycling is notably utilized in Madrid and Kuala Lumpur, each city reprocessing roughly 23% of its waste. However, this method accounts for only a tenth of Amman's waste management and is even less in Toronto. Composting garners minimal percentages, ranging from 2% to 9% across the board.


Download IELTS eBooks, get everything you need to achieve a high band score



Model Answer 2

The illustrative bar graph provides a comparative analysis of the methods of waste disposal in four distinct cities: Toronto, Madrid, Kuala Lumpur, and Amman.


In an overarching perspective, it's evident that landfill dominates as the primary method in Toronto, with a substantial prevalence in Amman as well. Conversely, Kuala Lumpur exhibits a strong preference for incineration. Madrid represents a more diversified approach, evenly distributing its waste management practices across three methods, while composting is notably the least favored method across all cities.


Detailing the nuances of the graph, Toronto's commitment to landfill is significant, with an overwhelming 70% of its waste managed in this manner. Amman's reliance on landfill is also noteworthy, constituting nearly half of its waste treatment. Madrid and Kuala Lumpur, meanwhile, show a lesser dependency on landfill, with 29% and 15% respectively. Kuala Lumpur's waste disposal strategy is predominantly characterized by incineration, which accounts for over half of its waste processing. This method is also substantial in Madrid and Amman, claiming 40% and 38% respectively. In Toronto, however, incineration plays a minimal role.


The recycling efforts are quite prominent in Madrid and Kuala Lumpur, with both cities recycling approximately 23% of their waste. Amman and Toronto are less focused on recycling, with it accounting for a minor fraction of their waste disposal methods. Composting, while the least utilized of the methods of waste disposal in four cities, shows a consistent yet minor application across the municipalities.


Download IELTS eBooks, get everything you need to achieve a high band score



Model Answer 3

The bar chart elucidates the differing methods of waste disposal employed across Toronto, Madrid, Kuala Lumpur, and Amman.


A cursory glance at the chart reveals two prominent trends: firstly, landfill is the most favored method in Toronto and a key method in Amman, and secondly, incineration is the method of choice in Kuala Lumpur. In contrast, Madrid’s waste disposal methods are more evenly spread across landfill, incineration, and recycling, with composting being the least utilized method of waste disposal in all four cities.


Toronto’s waste disposal strategy is heavily skewed towards landfill, with an impressive 70% of its waste managed through this method. Amman, while less reliant, still sees landfill handling a significant 50% of its waste. Madrid and Kuala Lumpur present a reduced reliance on landfill, with 29% and 15% of their waste treated by this method, respectively. On the other hand, Kuala Lumpur prominently utilizes incineration for over half of its waste management, a method that is also considerably employed in Madrid and Amman, with 40% and 38% of their waste disposed of respectively. Toronto exhibits only a marginal use of incineration.


When it comes to recycling, both Madrid and Kuala Lumpur are on par, each allocating around 23% of their waste management to this eco-friendly method. In stark contrast, recycling plays a minor role in the waste disposal methodologies of Toronto and Amman. Lastly, composting, despite its environmental advantages, is the least adopted of the methods of waste disposal in the four cities, with percentages lingering between 2% and 9%.

Get your personalised IELTS Essay Feedback from a former examiner


Download IELTS eBooks, get everything you need to achieve a high band score

0 comments

Comentarios

Obtuvo 0 de 5 estrellas.
Aún no hay calificaciones

Agrega una calificación
bottom of page