top of page

Fast Food Companies should not be Allowed to Advertise or They Should have the Right to Advertise?

Write about the following topic:


Many people think that fast food companies should not be allowed to advertise while others believe that all companies should have the right to advertise.

Do you agree or disagree?


Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge and experiences.


You should write at least 250 words.


IELTS Task 2 Band 9 Sample Essay prompt "Many people think that fast food companies should not be allowed to advertise while others believe that all companies should have the right to advertise. Do you agree or disagree? "

Get your personalised IELTS Essay Feedback from a former examiner


Download IELTS eBooks, get everything you need to achieve a high band score



Sample Essay 1

The contention over whether fast food companies should be allowed to advertise has sparked significant debate. On one hand, the argument for unrestricted advertising champions corporate freedom; on the other, it raises concerns about public health. This essay posits that while advertising is a fundamental right, it necessitates regulation in sectors with potential health implications.


Advocates for unrestricted advertising champion it as a cornerstone of free market economics, driving competition, innovation, and consumer awareness. They argue advertising is vital for informing consumers about the myriad options available, thus facilitating informed choices. From this perspective, targeting fast food companies for advertising regulation could undermine commercial freedom of expression, setting a precarious precedent that might extend unjustifiably into other sectors, potentially stifling the diversity and vibrancy of market communications.


However, the counterargument, which this essay supports, emphasizes the societal obligation to prioritize public health. The aggressive marketing of fast food, often specifically targeted at vulnerable groups such as children and low-income communities, plays a substantial role in exacerbating global health crises like obesity, diabetes, and heart disease. These conditions not only impose significant burdens on healthcare systems worldwide but also severely impact the quality of life of individuals. Thus, imposing restrictions on fast food advertising, in a manner akin to the regulation seen with tobacco and alcohol ads, emerges as both a prudent and necessary action. It underscores a collective commitment to public health, prioritizing the well-being of society over corporate interests, while still allowing for a degree of advertising that does not exploit vulnerable populations or undermine public health efforts.


Conclusively, while the right to advertise is fundamental, it should not come at the expense of public health. Fast food companies, given their significant impact on dietary habits and health outcomes, should be subject to stringent advertising regulations. This approach balances the need for commercial freedom with the imperative of safeguarding public health, advocating for responsible advertising that prioritizes societal well-being.

Download IELTS eBooks, get everything you need to achieve a high band score



Sample Essay 2

The role and impact of advertisements in shaping societal attitudes towards food consumption is a subject of fervent debate. There is an emerging consensus in certain quarters that fast-food companies should be precluded from advertising due to the perceived negative influence on dietary habits. However, others advocate for unrestricted corporate advertising as an integral part of a free-market economy. After careful deliberation, I posit that although unrestricted advertising is paramount to economic vibrancy, fast food companies must exercise this right responsibly to foster healthier consumer choices.


Opponents of fast-food advertising often underscore the correlative relationship between the ubiquity of such marketing efforts and increased rates of lifestyle diseases. According to a study by the National Center for Biotechnology Information, a significant correlation exists between exposure to fast-food promotions and increased instances of obesity and diabetes, particularly among younger audiences. In view of these sobering statistics, it is argued that curtailing fast food advertisements could stem the tide of such health maladies.


Yet, proponents of corporate autonomy contend that in a capitalist economy, a company's right to advertise is sacrosanct. Notable fast-food behemoths such as Subway and Taco Bell need the latitude to market their services and products, as it significantly impacts their financial viability and the economy at large. In this light, imposing draconian restrictions on advertising could destabilize the economic equilibrium.


Nonetheless, a potential resolution could lie in the realm of responsible advertising, which provides a middle ground between these polarized views. For instance, in Chile, novel legislation has necessitated that fast-food advertisements feature conspicuous nutritional information. This edict ensures that consumers are privy to essential dietary information, thereby enabling them to make informed choices. A similar strategy could strike a balance between allowing fast food companies to advertise while also ensuring public health is not compromised.


In conclusion, while the pervasive presence of fast-food advertising raises legitimate concerns over public health, completely curtailing such advertisements is not a viable solution in a free-market system. However, by mandating that these companies provide detailed nutritional information in their advertising, it is possible to balance economic freedoms with a commitment to public health.


Download IELTS eBooks, get everything you need to achieve a high band score



Sample Essay 3

In today's media-saturated world, a burgeoning segment of the population argues that fast food companies should not be allowed to advertise, citing the adverse health repercussions tied to their products. Conversely, proponents of corporate freedom opine that all companies, regardless of their industry, should enjoy an unfettered right to market their goods. Delving deeper into this discourse, I believe that while companies should retain the right to advertise, stringent regulations should be in place to safeguard the public from misleading and potentially harmful content.


At the crux of the debate lies the undeniable link between fast food consumption and a myriad of health issues. Research from the World Health Organization corroborates the notion that frequent consumption of these calorie-laden, nutrient-deficient meals exacerbates the global obesity epidemic. For instance, in the United States, a country where fast food advertisements pervade every media outlet, obesity rates have skyrocketed in tandem with the rise of these promotional campaigns. Thus, critics argue that such commercials, especially those targeting vulnerable demographics like children, are not merely informational but manipulative.


However, in a free market system, stifling a company's ability to promote its products can be viewed as antithetical to the principles of capitalism. Companies like McDonald’s or Burger King, for example, not only provide employment to millions but also contribute substantially to the global economy. To hamstring their advertising efforts could inadvertently lead to economic repercussions. Instead of outright bans, a more sagacious approach might be to advocate for transparent and educational advertising. For instance, in Sweden, regulations mandate that any fast-food advert targeting children must also educate them about the importance of a balanced diet. Such initiatives ensure that companies can still communicate with their audience, but in a manner that prioritizes public welfare.


In conclusion, while the concerns surrounding fast food advertisements are legitimate and deeply consequential, an outright ban might be too draconian a measure. A more nuanced approach, one that blends corporate freedom with societal responsibility, is imperative.


Get your personalised IELTS Essay Feedback from a former examiner


Download IELTS eBooks, get everything you need to achieve a high band score

Comments


bottom of page