top of page

People Are Suffering from Health Problems As a Result of Eating Too Much Fast Food - IELTS Band 9 Essay


In some countries, an increasing number of people are suffering from health problems as a result of eating too much fast food. It is therefore necessary for governments to impose a higher tax on this kind of food - IELTS Band 9 Essay

Get your personalised IELTS Essay Feedback from a former examiner


Download IELTS eBooks, get everything you need to achieve a high band score



Model Essay 1

In several nations, the prevalence of health issues linked to excessive fast food consumption is on the rise, suggesting that governments might consider implementing a higher tax on such foods. I strongly agree with this approach and will discuss the benefits of discouraging unhealthy eating habits and enhancing public health funding through increased taxation.


Firstly, imposing higher taxes on fast foods acts as a deterrent against frequent consumption. This method has been successfully applied to other health-related issues, such as tobacco usage, where increased taxes significantly lowered consumption rates. For instance, a study in Denmark showed a marked decrease in fast food sales following a tax increase, which correlated with improved public health statistics in subsequent years. The direct consequence of such a fiscal policy is the reduced intake of high-calorie, nutritionally deficient food items, which are known contributors to obesity, diabetes, and heart diseases. By making fast food financially less accessible, governments can steer populations towards healthier dietary choices, thereby reducing the incidence of chronic diseases prevalent in modern societies.


Furthermore, the revenue generated from these taxes can be strategically reinvested into public health initiatives. Such funding could support educational campaigns about nutrition, subsidize fruits and vegetables, and improve healthcare services. For example, revenue from Hungary's "junk food tax" has been used to fund health-promoting programs, including free gym memberships and educational initiatives that teach children about healthy eating habits. This not only helps in mitigating the immediate health risks associated with poor dietary choices but also fosters a culture of health awareness that benefits society at large. Additionally, the economic burden on healthcare systems can be alleviated, as fewer resources are required to treat diseases that are preventable through diet.


In conclusion, the imposition of higher taxes on fast food is a prudent strategy to combat the escalating health problems stemming from its consumption. Not only does this approach discourage unhealthy eating habits, but it also provides a valuable source of funding for public health initiatives.


Download IELTS eBooks, get everything you need to achieve a high band score



Model Essay 2

The burgeoning prevalence of fast food consumption in numerous countries has precipitated an alarming increase in health-related issues such as obesity, diabetes, and heart disease. In response, some advocate for imposing higher taxes on fast food as a deterrent. While this strategy has merits, a holistic approach involving education and infrastructure development may prove more efficacious in the long term.


Undoubtedly, fast food's accessibility and affordability contribute to its widespread consumption. However, this convenience also correlates with a rise in health ailments. Proponents of higher taxation argue that it could serve as a financial disincentive, potentially reducing the demand for unhealthy food choices. For instance, Denmark and Hungary have witnessed modest declines in junk food consumption after implementing fat taxes. These measures underscore the possibility of fiscal policies steering consumer behaviour towards healthier alternatives. Yet, the approach of taxing fast food has limitations and may inadvertently target lower socioeconomic groups, who often rely on such meals due to economic constraints. The effectiveness of a tax also hinges on the availability and affordability of nutritious alternatives. Without these, a tax alone might not dissuade consumption but rather exacerbate food insecurity among the most vulnerable populations.


A more sustainable solution lies in addressing the root causes of poor dietary habits. Governments should invest in comprehensive educational programs that inform the public about nutrition and the long-term impacts of their food choices. Such initiatives, coupled with improvements in food infrastructure, can facilitate easier access to affordable, healthy alternatives. For example, subsidizing fruits and vegetables could make healthier options more appealing and accessible, thereby naturally decreasing the demand for fast food. This integrated approach not only addresses immediate health concerns linked to fast food consumption but also fosters a healthier populace equipped with knowledge and resources to make beneficial dietary choices.


In conclusion, while the taxation of fast food can contribute to a decrease in consumption, it is not a panacea for the health crises engendered by poor dietary choices. A multifaceted approach that includes education, subsidies for healthy foods, and public awareness campaigns is more effective.


Download IELTS eBooks, get everything you need to achieve a high band score



Model Essay 3

While I agree that higher taxes on fast food might discourage its consumption, I believe that implementing comprehensive educational programs on nutrition and enhancing access to affordable, healthy food options would be more effective and sustainable solutions to this growing health crisis.


On one hand, health problems associated with fast food consumption are of significant concern. Obesity, diabetes, and cardiovascular diseases are increasingly prevalent in countries with high fast food consumption. These health issues not only place a burden on individuals but also strain healthcare systems and economies, escalating public health expenditures and reducing workforce productivity. Tax regulation may potentially reduce consumption, thus leading to a lower rate of health problems. For example, countries like Hungary and Mexico that have implemented high taxes on unhealthy food have witnessed a decline in consumption, indicating a positive shift in dietary habits.


On the other hand, taxation on fast food is not a sustainable solution to tackle health issues in the long run. The effectiveness of this tax strategy hinges on several factors: the tax amount itself and whether affordable, healthier food alternatives are readily available. Moreover, higher taxation can disproportionately affect low-income individuals who rely on fast food for its affordability and convenience, potentially leading to increased financial strain without improving their dietary choices. The government should consider implementing comprehensive measures such as providing education on healthy eating habits, promoting access to affordable nutritious food, and regulating the fast food industry to ensure better quality and lower fat content in fast food offerings.


In conclusion, while I agree that it is crucial to address health issues related to fast food consumption, I believe that imposing higher tax on fast food is not an ideal solution. The government should explore a wide range of measures to promote healthy eating habits and provide affordable healthy food alternatives.


Get your personalised IELTS Essay Feedback from a former examiner


Download IELTS eBooks, get everything you need to achieve a high band score

0 comments

Comments

Rated 0 out of 5 stars.
No ratings yet

Add a rating
bottom of page