top of page

Professionals, such as Doctors and Engineers, to be Restricted or Free to Work - Task 2 Band 9 Essay

Updated: Aug 29, 2023

You should spend about 40 minutes on this task.

Write about the following topic:

Some people believe that professionals, such as doctors and engineers, should be required to work in the country where they did their training. Others believe they should be free to work in another country if they wish.

Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge and experiences.

You should write at least 250 words.

Get your Detailed Essay Feedback from an IELTS Examiner

Task 2 Band 9 Essay Sample - Some people believe that professionals, such as doctors and engineers, should be required to work in the country where they did their training. Others believe they should be free to work in another country if they wish.

Get our downloadable eBooks, learn the details how to write a high band essay

IELTS Task 2 Band 9 Sample Essay (1)

While some people insist it is mandatory for professionals to serve for the nations where they received training programs, others contend that individuals should feel free to work in any other countries wherever they want. Though the onus is on the skilled people to give back to their nations where they were trained, in my opinion, freedom of choosing workplace beyond of geographical boundary should be warranted for all professionals for further development of science and technology and better human lifestyle.

After finishing the training courses, working in a country that provided such programs is professionals’ obligation because the nation supported with their education using its all-out resources in the forms of funding student loans, training equipment, dorms and so on. To be more specific, a nation generously provides its universities with high tech lab space, knowledgeable instructors, safe housing, insurance, prompt medical response, food and nutrition, and other associated requirements. For instance, it takes incredible sum of resources for a nation to train a medical professional in Korea, because the experience in hospitals cannot be gained without the support from the country’s field-wise specific laws and regulations. Once all of these supports have been made available for the students to grow groomed, it is time for the educated individuals to give back to the nation and use their knowledge to further its development.

Nevertheless, freedom to choose the place to work allows greater chance of success in scientific development, which can lead to much more welfare for the more people worldwide. The professionals are able to grab potential chances in another country with advanced skills and knowledge compared to a country where they received training programs. For instance, ten years ago, the knowledge called ‘Artificial neural network’, which is a fundamental theory for AI products popular in recent days, was less developed in Korea, compared to Canada and the USA. Therefore, a large number of scientists went abroad to work in this field, and greater improvement they made in the field enabled further development of AI products.

To sum up, since allowing freedom to work wherever the professionals want makes the scientific and technological development possible which leads to better human lifestyle, they should not be restricted to work in a particular country.

Get our downloadable eBooks, learn the details how to write a high band essay

IELTS Task 2 Band 9 Sample Essay (2)

There is an ongoing debate over whether professionals, particularly in fields such as medicine and engineering, who receive their education domestically, should be required to work in their home country or have the freedom to choose an overseas position. This essay will examine both sides of the argument before explaining why I support the latter position.

Supporters of mandatory employment in the country of education for in-demand professions have several reasons for their stance. The first is that tertiary education is often funded by taxpayers, and the cost of education is prohibitively expensive. If students do not receive government support, only the wealthy will be able to afford to graduate, limiting opportunities for potentially exceptional talent. As a result, alumni have a responsibility to give back to the society that helped them. Furthermore, these professionals are likely to be more familiar with the cultural norms of their country, enabling them to achieve better outcomes for citizens.

However, many believe that professionals should be free to choose where they work. The most important factor is the amount of time professionals devote to their education, sacrificing relationships and incurring debt. Allowing them to move overseas for better pay or a better lifestyle should be seen as a reward for their sacrifices. For example, Indian doctors often move to Western countries because not only are the salaries higher, but the natural environment is healthier for their families. Additionally, it could be argued that all taxpayers benefit from some form of government assistance and, as such, have a duty to their country, creating a potential barrier to migration.

In conclusion, I believe that both sides of the debate present compelling arguments. However, if a country provides equal opportunities for all citizens to receive an education, there is no reason to limit anyone's ability to choose their career location freely. Moreover, I believe that migrants often contribute significantly to their home country through financial remittances. Therefore, governments should focus on creating economic conditions that encourage in-demand professionals to seek employment locally, rather than imposing restrictions on their movement.

Get our downloadable eBooks, learn the details how to write a high band essay

IELTS Task 2 Band 9 Sample Essay (3)

The debate surrounding the obligation of skilled professionals like doctors and engineers to contribute their services to their home countries after training is a provocative topic. Some people posit that this requirement is essential due to these professionals' critical role in national development, whereas others advocate for the freedom to capitalize on global job opportunities. Although both viewpoints hold merit, my stance leans towards endorsing the freedom of employment choice for these professionals, considering the multifaceted benefits this flexibility can offer on an individual as well as a global level.

On the one hand, proponents of the idea that these highly trained professionals should serve their home countries primarily rely on the premise of reciprocity. It is often the case that in many nations, government subsidies and investments are pivotal in providing state-of-the-art facilities and top-notch educators in medical and engineering institutes. These investments aim to nurture a skilled workforce that would subsequently contribute to the nation's socioeconomic progress. Moreover, the emigration of such skilled professionals can lead to 'brain drain', depriving the country of potential innovations and advancements.

However, I am of the opinion that these professionals should not be restricted in their choice of employment location. One fundamental reason lies in the pursuit of improved living standards and career advancement. For instance, a doctor trained in India might receive a significantly higher salary and access better medical facilities if employed in the USA. Such an international experience can not only help enhance their professional skills but also provide them with the means to support their families back home. Furthermore, the movement of professionals across borders fosters the exchange of knowledge and ideas, catalysing global scientific and technological advancement. A case in point is the collaborative research among scientists from different nations that expedited the development of the COVID-19 vaccine.

In conclusion, while the argument for professionals serving their home countries post-training has merit, I believe the liberty to seek employment opportunities internationally brings about broader benefits. This freedom not only enhances individual professionals' career prospects and living standards but also contributes significantly to global scientific and technological progress.

IELTS Task 2 Band 8.5 Sample Essay

There is a debate among certain groups today about whether skilled professionals should be required to work in the country where they received their initial training or if they should have the freedom to work anywhere. In my opinion, as long as their qualifications meet the necessary requirements, all individuals should have the right to choose where they want to work.

Some argue that professionals owe a debt of gratitude to the location where they received their training. For example, a doctor who received quality education and government aid in the United States may be asked to stay and use their skills to benefit their community. Similarly, engineers, scientists, and teachers who have benefited from local resources and support may be expected to give back to their society.

However, the freedom to choose where one lives and works is a fundamental right. Most professionals may choose to stay in the same country where they received their training, but they should not be restricted in their choice of location. Moving to another country may present challenges such as obtaining certifications and adjusting to a new work environment, but these obstacles should not prevent individuals from exercising their right to work in another country. Additionally, limiting the movement of professionals would restrict the exchange of knowledge and culture across borders.

In conclusion, while certain standards must be met, all professionals should have the freedom to work abroad. This policy is already in place for many occupations and should be extended to all qualified professionals. It is crucial to recognize the importance of individual choice and the potential benefits of international exchange.

IELTS Task 2 Band 8 Sample Essay

The issue of whether highly trained professionals should be required to work in the same country where they did their training has been a subject of debate. While a few people believe that such professionals should be mandated to work in their home country, this essay will argue against this notion, positing that they should have the freedom to work wherever they choose.

One reason to support the idea of allowing professionals to work wherever they want is that education, in most cases, is self-funded. Hence, it would be unjust to require that they stay in a country solely due to having received education there. Besides, a lot of people pursue education with the aim of securing better opportunities abroad, so it would be unfair to restrict their freedom of movement.

Furthermore, it is beneficial to have highly trained professionals move around the world to share their skills and increase diversity. They can also contribute to the economies of other countries and help them grow. Moreover, it is essential to acknowledge that all individuals should have some freedom of movement, including those with specialized skills. If they are prevented from moving to another country, it would amount to a violation of their fundamental rights.

In conclusion, highly trained professionals should have the freedom to work in any country they choose. It would be unfair to restrict their movement, especially considering that they have self-funded their education in most cases. Additionally, they can bring value to different societies and contribute to their growth. Nonetheless, they could choose to give back to their home country for the sake of decency, but it should not be mandatory.

Get your Detailed Essay Feedback from an IELTS Examiner

Get our downloadable eBooks, learn the details how to write a high band essay

bottom of page