top of page

Directors of Large Organizations Earn Much Higher Salaries Than Ordinary Employees Do - Task 2 Essay

Write about the following topic:

Directors of large organizations earn much higher salaries than ordinary employees do. Some believe it is necessary, but others think that it is unfair.

Discuss both these views and give your own opinions.


Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge and experiences.


You should write at least 250 words.


IELTS Task 2 Band 9 Sample essay in response to the prompt "Directors of large organizations earn much higher salaries than ordinary employees do. Some believe it is necessary, but others think that it is unfair. Discuss both these views and give your own opinions."

Get your personalised IELTS Essay Feedback from a former examiner


Download IELTS eBooks, get everything you need to achieve a high band score



Sample Essay 1

In contemporary business practices, the vast disparity between the remuneration of company directors and their employees is a subject of contentious debate. This dichotomy is rooted in the belief that such a financial gap is essential for organizational efficacy, though it is often critiqued as inherently unjust. This essay will delve into both perspectives, asserting that while executive compensation is vital for attracting talent, it necessitates a balance to foster a fair and motivated workforce.


Proponents of high executive pay argue that it serves as a necessary incentive. In the competitive landscape of corporate leadership, substantial salaries are perceived as imperative to attract and retain individuals possessing the unique skill set required for high-stakes decision-making and strategic planning. For instance, a CEO's decision can significantly impact a company's direction, necessitating a compensation package commensurate with this responsibility and the rare expertise they bring. This viewpoint suggests that the disparity in pay is a reflection of the disproportionate impact executives have on a company's fortunes, thereby justifying the gap as a strategic investment in leadership quality.


Conversely, critics of this pay gap highlight its contribution to workplace inequality and its potential to demoralize the broader employee base. They argue that excessive executive compensation undermines the principle of equitable reward for effort, creating a chasm that can diminish morale and productivity among ordinary employees. For example, when the rank-and-file perceive their contributions as undervalued, especially in comparison to the astronomical sums awarded to their superiors, it can lead to dissatisfaction and a decline in company loyalty. This perspective posits that a more equitable distribution of wealth within a company can enhance collective motivation, fostering a more cohesive and productive organizational culture.


In summary, attracting top talent with competitive pay is crucial, yet it's imperative to prevent workforce demotivation. Balancing leadership rewards with fair recognition of all employees is key to sustaining morale and efficiency. A just and motivated workforce is vital for lasting business success, highlighting the importance of equitable compensation strategies.

Download IELTS eBooks, get everything you need to achieve a high band score



Sample Essay 2

The debate over the salary scales within corporations, particularly the stark contrast between the earnings of executives and regular employees, has sparked considerable discourse. This discussion pivots on the necessity of hefty executive salaries for corporate success against the backdrop of fairness and employee morale. This essay will explore the justification for substantial executive compensation while advocating for a harmonious balance that also respects the contributions of all employees.


On one hand, the argument for rewarding company leaders with higher salaries hinges on the premise of meritocracy and the unique pressures of executive roles. High-level decision-making, coupled with the responsibility of steering the company's direction, demands a skill set that is both rare and in high demand. For instance, an executive who navigates the company through a financial downturn by making astute decisions deserves recognition and reward commensurate with the impact of their actions. This school of thought posits that significant salaries are not just a reward but a necessary tool to attract and retain talent capable of such feats.


However, the disparity in compensation raises concerns about equity and the organizational culture. When the salary gap widens excessively, it risks fostering an environment of disenchantment among the wider employee base. An equitable approach to compensation suggests that while recognizing the additional responsibilities of executives, the contributions of all employees towards the company’s achievements should also be valued. For example, the collective efforts of employees working on a project are integral to its success, illustrating the need for a compensation strategy that acknowledges the importance of each role within the company.


Conclusively, while the rationale for high executive pay is anchored in their pivotal role and the expertise they bring, it is essential to cultivate a culture of fairness and respect for every employee’s contribution. Achieving a balanced compensation structure that rewards both leadership and the workforce is crucial for fostering a positive and productive organizational climate. This balance is not merely about fairness but is intrinsic to sustaining motivation, loyalty, and overall corporate prosperity.

 

Download IELTS eBooks, get everything you need to achieve a high band score



Sample Essay 3

The salary differential between senior executives and ordinary employees in corporations often fuels debates. Some individuals advocate for this wage disparity, citing the demands and responsibilities associated with executive roles, while others argue for a more equitable pay scale, asserting it fosters workplace harmony and productivity. Although I acknowledge the validity of both perspectives, my viewpoint inclines towards the necessity of a higher remuneration for directors, albeit with a justified and not excessively wide wage gap.


Advocates for wage parity emphasize its role in promoting a sense of fairness and camaraderie within the organization. All employees, irrespective of their positions, collectively contribute to the company's success. They assert that a more equitable wage distribution could enhance employees' motivation and engagement, thereby bolstering productivity. For example, Gravity Payments, a Seattle-based company, made headlines in 2015 by implementing a $70,000 minimum wage policy for all its employees. The company has since reported increased employee productivity and substantial business growth, illustrating the potential benefits of such an approach.


Conversely, proponents of higher executive remuneration argue that the extensive responsibilities, expertise, and dedication required of these positions justify their superior earnings. Executives not only navigate the company's strategic direction but also bear the brunt of its failures, often working long hours under significant pressure. They are also typically seasoned professionals who have worked their way up the ranks, investing substantial time and effort into their careers. For instance, Elon Musk, CEO of Tesla and SpaceX, is renowned for his extreme work ethic and strategic vision, which have been instrumental in the unprecedented success of his companies. His significant compensation is seen by many as a fair reflection of his contributions.


In conclusion, while promoting a sense of fairness through a more balanced wage structure is important, it is equally crucial to acknowledge the extensive responsibilities and commitments of executives with commensurate remuneration. This ensures that top talent is attracted and retained, ultimately driving the company's success. However, corporations should strive for a balance, ensuring that the wage gap does not become so vast as to demotivate other employees or create an overly hierarchical culture.



Sample Essay 4

Supporters of the salary gap between directors and ordinary employees contend that the high remuneration earned by directors of large organizations is reflective of their monumental responsibilities, thus rendering it a necessity. On the other hand, detractors perceive this imbalance as a driver of income inequality, posing it as an unjust arrangement. This essay will delve into the intricacies of both views, encapsulating the debate over whether directors of large organizations earning much higher salaries is a justified necessity or an unfair inequality.


From one standpoint, it is undeniable that the executives of major corporations carry an extraordinary weight of responsibility. They are tasked with setting strategic directions, making critical decisions that can impact the livelihoods of thousands, and representing the company in the global arena. Their roles demand exceptional expertise, foresight, and dedication. Given these unique pressures, proponents argue that higher salaries act as both compensation for the burden shouldered and as an incentive to attract top-tier talent. Take, for example, Tim Cook, CEO of Apple. His remuneration is commensurate with the immense task of steering one of the world's most valuable companies, a role that demands unparalleled strategic acumen and industry knowledge.


However, critics argue that the current scale of executive remuneration is disproportionate and promotes a culture of corporate greed. It is posited that the widening salary gap is emblematic of systemic income inequality. The disproportionate compensation could be better invested in the company's broader workforce to enhance motivation, reduce turnover, and contribute to a healthier corporate culture. For instance, when Dan Price, CEO of Gravity Payments, decided to cut his salary to increase his employees' minimum wage, not only did job satisfaction skyrocket, but the company also experienced a significant increase in productivity and profits.


In my opinion, while directors should receive compensation that reflects their significant responsibilities, there is a pressing need to reassess the magnitude of the disparity in the context of broader societal implications. Striking a balance is crucial - incentivising leadership and expertise, while also ensuring fair wealth distribution within the organisation.


In conclusion, the debate over executive pay raises critical questions about corporate responsibility and income equity. Striking a balance between rewarding executive talent and maintaining a fair, motivational pay structure for all employees is a complex, yet necessary, task that modern corporations must undertake.


Get your personalised IELTS Essay Feedback from a former examiner


Download IELTS eBooks, get everything you need to achieve a high band score

Comments


bottom of page